Search results

Right I just did it. And I added that mounting to autostart - tested and works. What a story... heh. And I bring back honor for ZFS :)

Jesus!!!!!!!! they are encrypted! I contacted with old Admin, he didn't write any documentation about that and thats why I couldn't know fuck. They are encrypted with geli tool. After mounting them and importing with "zpool import backuppc" all is working! Fuck, sorry for your wasted time. Regards

[root@backup1 ~]# hexdump -C /dev/ada2 | head -20 00000000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................| * 00002000 77 e6 04 16 77 c5 60 63 56 e9 e9 25 89 0f 19 cb |w...w.`cV..%....| 00002010 e3 26 13 7c 3b c0 43 d3 bf dd d7 11 15 61 d5 76 |.&.|;.C......a.v|...

[root@backup1 ~]# sysctl kern.disks kern.disks: ada4 ada3 ada2 ada1 ada0 # gpart list returns info only about ada3 and ada4 (good pool)

There isn't any recover tools for FreeBSD like "testdisk" for DOS ?

Don't know, I took over that server after old admin [root@backup1 ~]# gpart show ada0 gpart: No such geom: ada0. [root@backup1 ~]# gpart recover ada0 gpart: arg0 'ada0': Invalid argument There isn't any ZFS or GPT strings So in summary it looks like something overwrite/delete partition...

What can I say... 1. 3 disks from missed pool are visible in dmesg 2. zfs doesn't see them, "zpool status" see only 1 pool not 2 3. 'zpool import" gives nothing 4. zdb -l /dev/ada0 (one of the disks from missed pool), gives: [root@backup1 ~]# zdb -l /dev/ada1...

[root@backup1 ~]# zpool status pool: zroot state: ONLINE scan: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM zroot ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada3p4 ONLINE 0 0 0...

Hi, We had raidz1 pool on our FreeBSD 11. It suddenly crashed and after that it has status "unavaliable". I came with idea to clean that server inside from dust and so on. After that operation that pool missed at all! What is interesting BSD see all 3 disks but "zpool status" doesn't show that...

ok , thanks

You're right. I fixed symlink and now all works. Thanks Admin ;)

Hi, After migrate some Makefile from FreeBSD6 to new one (FreeBSD11) make file doesn't work. Maybe this is caused by something else ? I don't know. Currently I have even such basic Makefile: first: @bin/generator.pl and after make command I get: make: exec(bin/generator.pl) failed...

Such a solution would be quite revolutionary for us and I would have to spend some time to test it and so on, so, I think we will stay with the old good standard FreeBSD which we know very well - this aspect is very important. This is a production environment and you know, we can not allow for...

I know, but ZFS doesn't have any fsck so start will be faster yet Recently I installed another router with 9.2 and there is strange problem with shaping in IPFW. Upload is ok but download in half of value, very strange problem and I didn't find solution and cause. So now I will check this 9.3 -...

The reason I want to use ZFS on a router is that it doesn't need any fsck after a power failure. The system starts right away. This is very important to a core router (most important), it needs to start as fast as possible. After @junovitch's mention of problems with IPSec I think I will use...

Hi, I'm wondering whether to install FreeBSD 10 with ZFS on router (at ISP with 200Mb flow full duplex). I mean I don't know if it will work stable? Has it any known bugs already or maybe it is quite good checked already? Or I should install 8.4 just? Also I'm afraid of ZFS. Should I be scared...

Well, we've found the reason, Only em0 on our router supports MSI-X and only she has few interrupts on few cores. In Freebsd 8.2 that feature is enabled in default. # pciconv -lcv em0@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x34da8086 chip=0x10d38086 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel...

Hi, We have a border router with 5 em nics. OS is FreeBSD 8.2 x64. # top -PSH last pid: 6097; load averages: 1.46, 1.45, 1.48 up 31+13:32:57 14:02:32 145 processes: 11 running, 111...

I've checked by tcpdump. In some moment there isn't any arp reply indeed. But why router request for arp of some IP, when this arp is in table ?? strange.. Well, we think the reason is Dlink switch connected to the router. He didn't answer sometimes and that's why. thanks for help.

Hi, We have some border router with FreeBSD 8.2 x64. Recently we've looked strange thing. In some moment it can't ping some address IP, but when You delete his arp You can pinging this IP again. MAC of this IP is still the same. So.. what is going on ? All ARP table has about 700 MAC addresses.