Search results

I managed to get most of my stuff out via the recovery software. I had to hook up both disks, emulate RAID 1 and scan that way. Of course, I have the stuff in folders by file extension, but ~90% of what I needed is there. Will promptly install Windows Server 2012 where I am trained in and know...

If I select the RAW drive, it starts at 0. But if I scan for a UFS partition, it finds one at that sector as the start. When I run the scan, it scans from 1282338 to the end. I don't know where the partition table is or starts at. But like I said, the scan finds all the directories and files...

When the 'drive' failed, it was synchronized and both were listed as online/active in nas4free NAS4Free WebGUI. However, once synchronization turned to 100%, the 'disk' /RAID/mirror disappeared. When you try to mount it it gives error of missing ufsid. In /dev/mirror/ I only see the raw 'drive'...

This will copy the drive, not the mirror... and I only have access to the mirror via NAS4Free in SSH and WebGUI, but that way I don't have ports or additional drives available. In any case, I am installing FreeBSD on a spare drive and will attach one of my other 1 TB drives and try dd. But...

It's read only mode, supposedly. I am running in a RAID 1 emulation this time (under Windows) to see if the scan will be able to recover the files. If not, I am close to giving up. Doesn't look like anybody on NAS4Free has any idea how to approach this issue. Also, I don't know the best way to...

I am doing another try with the recover software, so it's scanning for about three hours. gpart has no reference of the 1 TB disks. It's strange, as the RAID is active, but there are no slices/partitions. And the recovery software sees the files, the sizes, but 99.99% of recovery is garbage...

Hello all, I am writing here as a last attempt to get help in recovering my data. In short, I made a RAID 1 to ensure stuff like this doesn't happen. Turns out my 5400 rpm HDD from 2001 is more reliable. I will be extremely grateful if you can help me recover my data over the last eight years...

Where is the 2048 x 1536 version? :P

I wrote an e-mail to the mailing list a few months ago, but got no response. Below is my testing on ThinkPad X220, maybe it can help, maybe not. As a side question, how many more years do we have to wait for a working suspend/resume? I think I personally have been waiting since 7.X. This is a...

Does the suspend/resume work? I know it worked at some point on T/X #20's. I am asking because by X220 doesn't wake.

Hello, I asked on the mailing lists but there have been no replies in the past couple days. Is there a way to set a laptop (I have ThinkPad X220) not to draw energy from the battery when it's on AC? In Windows once the battery is not charging and you are on AC, the battery is totally...

I would like to say with pleasure that 14.9 works on my X220. Since I went through the full method once all I needed this time was: update source via csup (same file) apply patch, remove .rej's make -j8 buildworld && make installworld reboot !!ATTENTION!! READ THE UPDATED FAQ HERE...

When I run X, CPU skyrockets to 50C at best. Then to 60C when doing browser stuff and the fan goes crazy. I do have powerd and the adaptive flag and states do change, however, I think the problem is CPU stays in turbo mode and highest mode longer and fan can't keep up. I usually don't go above...

I have followed Toto's guide and Xfce4 works. When moving windows around, there seems to be some breaking, but I don't see any of the mentioned artifacts anywhere. 720p runs with sound fine. I have a minor problem, though. Before Xfce4 just doing startx, and exiting, I get a black screen. I...

Woohoo 9.1 as target is nice. Of course, you can use manual patches meanwhile as well. GJ

You need to do legacy style MBR booting. This has been discussed in a couple of places. You can also see this topic: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-acpi/2012-March/007463.html Also read through this topic for further information...

Regarding the X220, since I'm looking to get one, and don't want to open new thread: 1. Which wireless has better support? ThinkPad 11b/g/n Wireless (Realtek RTL8192SE / RTL8188CE) Intel Centrino Wireless-N 1000 2. I've read bad reviews about webcam having poor quality on GNU/Linux, so...

For laptops, core2duo, yes. Desktops, Pentium dual-cores have 64bit support as well. I am also looking into a X220, but my major concern is the intel driver still in dev. We will see how that goes.

Unfortunately, due to the "official" lack of support for Android development and Glassfish server, I am forced to use a VirtualBox image with GNU/Linux. My main studies are in java, and I was only able to get Eclipse to work with regular java. I was also able to get EJB's to work with Netbeans...

OpenBSD was attractive to me due to working suspend/resume for i386 machines and better wireless, which made it a better choice for my old laptops. I don't like the attitude in the OpenBSD community, however, nor the lack of official forum (I do read mail lists, but sometimes I prefer forums)...