Search results for query: dpkg

...touch uncompress ypdomainname zegrep zless root@:/root# ls /usr/bin/ [ base64 chsh debconf-communicate dpkg-divert faillog gpg-zip install link lslogins nl perl5.22.1 pwdx sdiff...

...These repos are kept in sources.list. This can be edited manually, or using apt-add-repository, which can also be used to remove a repo. If you really want to start building things from source, I think you need to look at the dpkg layer below apt. I don't think this is done commonly, though.

haven't used dpkg very often, i normally would just have apt do the thinking and the work for me, and for years my philosophy was that if it wants to remove a package then something is wrong and one should think twice before proceeding. went well for me anyhow... thanks again, am just finishing...

I never used Debian but I think dpkg does that by default. It is very common indeed, IIRC Gentoo emerge just remove the target, the dependencies are handled by --depclean. And I think Arch Linux pacman follow the same behaviour if you use just the -R. :) I think sysutils/consolekit2 is not...

...none of its files will be left behind on the system (that's the theory at least). On Linux some very common names for package management are DPKG (used on Debian based distributions) and RPM (used on RedHat based Linux distributions). In the past FreeBSD used the same package management...

I am seriously suggesting this for a consideration, it is invented many times over: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dependency_hell Especially this part: Also:

...Operation not permitted ln: failed to create symbolic link 'stderr': Operation not permitted /sbin/MAKEDEV: don't know how to make device "tty0" dpkg: error processing package makedev (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 dpkg: dependency...

...some older BSD apps compiled using it), understand a few kernel libc differences. I'm definitely sided with making world + porting source vs dpkg bins (linux) and source that was never meant to definitely build "outside the keyed admin. build servers" (debian). #1 run FreeBSD in a virtual...

...from sources, not from already compiled binaries. Instead, if you want to install rpm or deb packages, there are both archive/rpm4 and archive/dpkg in ports. However I don't see the point of using them, if not with linux compatibility. EDIT: SirDice sorry, I posted before seeing your reply :oops:

...is FreeBSD under the hood. If you go with linux, slap Debian/stable on it, it has long support, is rock solid and has a big software repository. dpkg/apt is superior to everything else when it comes to packagemanagement, but then again ZFS is superior to everything else when it comes to FS...

...or postinstall script also could ask how to handle stuff for users and groups. A lot of packages from Debian come with such scripts and with dpkg-reconfigure packagename you can tune those packages even after installation. And you also can tune it with modifying config files manually. To...

...to deal with this. I decided to test Lubuntu 15.04: it installed but after a few hours of intense-for-desktop disk activity, I discovered that dpkg-* binaries had been corrupted and were seg. faulting and apt-* scripts were failing. In syslog there were errors about NCQ. So I reinstalled and...

...to Debian. If you want stability and don't care for new software so much use the LTS version. If you dislike Ubuntu go with Debian stable. dpkg/apt is probably the best package manager out there, never had any issues in the last decade. BTW apt-get autoremove packagename removes the package...

...the dependency solver can not find any solutions because of conflicting demands. There is work going on to implement so called abstract dependencies with a PROVIDES/REQUIRES mechanism (like what Debian's DPKG does) but that's going to be serious overhaul of the ports system when it's implemented.

Why do you need Debian's apt? FreeBSD has own package manager, see pkg manual page. There is a port/package archivers/dpkg. And which linux binaries do you want install? The open source programs are available on FreeBSD too so you don't need plus layer.

...when it comes to dependencies, they are "set in stone" at package creation time. What would be needed is "virtual dependencies" a la Debian's DPKG system where a package can depend on an abstract entity, let's say "MySQL compatible DB server" and installing the MariaDB server package would...

Dear all, Suppose i have a Debian distro, Debian considers all of files in packages, for example: root@debian:/home/mohsen/test# dpkg -S /bin/ls coreutils: /bin/ls root@debian:/home/mohsen/test# dpkg -S /bin/pwd coreutils: /bin/pwd root@debian:/home/mohsen/test# dpkg -S /sbin/ifconfig...

Re: [Solved]PHP, MySQL\MariaDB & Apache\Nginx "FAMP" not wor Well, I improved on my previous idea of comparing dpkgto pkg and compared the output of phpinfo(); command. To my immense annoyance and frustration I noticed databases/php5-mysql was missing. Installation of that port and things...

...that dependencies are missing. Some of the projects I am looking at don't have great documentation, some do; however, you have given me an idea. :beer If I compare the dpkg --list from the working Debian machine and the pkg info from the FreeBSD system I could spot any PHP extensions missing.

...find anything; anyone knows what's the name of that package? Also, is it possible to determine which package contains a specific file? (for example, in Debian I can run dpkg -S <file> or apt-file search <file> to get the name of the package that has <file>, is there an equivalent in FreeBSD?).