Search results for query: docker

So the idea was that dynamic libraries are loaded *once* and shared by multiple processes. Only if they are the same version. AppImage/Snaps/Docker/etc provide different instances of the same dynamic library, of different versions. So in many ways this has proven that static linking (as is done...

This is what Golang & Docker did. But static & shared have all their pros and cons. And we're also talking about interpreted languages dependencies. Packaging Python dependencies is a nightmare.

...propose instead of the usual suspects that their junior developers (really just analysts with python knowledge) were leaning towards (AppImage/Docker/Snaps). But luckily they moved away from Linux entirely. So ultimately, even if no static linkage; just bundle the damn libs and run that in a...

...linked libraries and package managers do. I always found that very odd, how the same people critical of static linking are fine pushing Docker. They claim it's bad, difficult to update, inefficient, and insecure to build the binaries in that way. Yet it's totally fine to ship a copy of...

You can run vulnerable software in jails: it is not as convenient because you have to create the jail and compile the application, but it is more isolated. I had not read it, so everyone was happy, :) .

Correct me if I'm wrong but a sandboxed AppImage still has access to the user's home directory, no? That makes the isolation mostly useless. That makes occasionally living with vulnerable libraries a chore. Let's say libfoo-1.0 is vulnerable and libfoo-1.1 is fixed. You start out with 6 copies...

...more easily and then you don't even have to have those (maybe one day) vulnerable libraries installed in the system at all. And if the AppImage is not run as service (*cough* docker *cough*) I can live with running the vulnerable libraries from time to time from inside an image, maybe even...

...(I installed 14.3-RELEASE), I'm exploring jails (through bastille), to see if I can replicate my home server setup that I have with Linux and docker. So far so good, most everything is setup and working, but I have a very tiny question. I'm installing software through "pkg" in my jails. I...

Whatever it takes to get Docker support. A good sound system Linux would steal. Send two of the three firewalls to ports.

...search? A: Although I referenced the design from CachyOS packages search, I entirely wrote the code myself. The original uses Next.js on Docker while retrieving package information from its dedicated api endpoint, whereas this project uses SvelteKit with Vercel for hosting and Neon for...

...the system’s exposure, wouldn’t it? Enter jails. The lightweight answer to containerisation, that’s been around for a long time before Docker became trendy. Setting up a Jail As with everything in the tech industry, there are at least half a dozen different ways to achieve the same...

...bloats and clutters on system level (systemd, package management, snaps, flatpacks). But ultimately client/end device future belongs to microkernels - if only for ease of using myriad of drivers. Server will belong to FreeBSD....once the Docker phase implodes, thanks to it's poor security design.

...would have one of his famous hissy fits. And the FAANG don't care, their scale is such that an individual OS node is no longer important enough to worry about; they instead build much larger systems (for an example, look at gRPC, MapReduce and Borg, which created Hadoop, Docker and Kubernetes).

A FreeBSD specific Podman repo with a top 20 similar to docker.io

If your interest in FlatPak is security, then a Jail is probably best. Linux doesn't have a standard approach to this so hence why FlatPak, Docker, Snaps and all that other crap exist. If your interest in it is avoiding spraying cruft all over the filesystem, just use pkg_fetch(8) and extract...

...is the preferred/standard way of deploying an application to FreeBSD? I have a Go app, and on my local dev machine I run it and test it with Docker. I have also deployed it in the past using Docker to a VPS when doing a real world stress test. But AFAIK docker does not run on FreeBSD or...

This tutorial is not related to podman containers but to run Alpine jails as in Linux I'm trying to use podman.

...for Alpine and Ubuntu with userlands in /compat/alpine and /compat/ubuntu . For containers builds, I settled on just using Alpine and adjusted docker-compose.yml to pull Alpine based dependencies. They ran fine in Docker on Alpine Linux on real hardware and in Podman on FreeBSD with Alpine...

...micro-kernel eventually. Because of driver-hell....and security/stability. FreeBSD will be for servers using bhyve virtualization, because Docker (or Podman run as root), combined with systemd linux containers will be deemed security risk. Jails will become Alcatraz or they will not survive...

Yeah docker is a huge turn off for discourse, absolutely hate using docker images.