Personally I prefer FASM, it's great.
But it all depends what do you want to do.
P.S.
I love A86 assemblers syntax, too bad it's unmaintained (at least it looks like that) Windows/DOS only binary blob.
Thanks. I either for got that, or didn't knew about it.
Haven't been coding C for 2+ years :)
And yes, you are right about argv, my statement was very wrong.
I was reading getopt manual (and also check in ls source) and I saw one line of C code, that I couldn't understand how (more importantly why it works).
After processing command line arguments you can see this code
argc -= optind;
argv += optind;
First line is obvious.
On second line...
Personally I don't know. But different implementations might have different behavior.
I think you should ask on @stable mailinglist.
Currently It looks like a bug, but I'm not that much into sed.
This is offtopic, but: I really don't understand, why:
1) they use binary config
2) They have single process to do everything....
as a result of 2, Enlightenment hands in about 15 min, and the only thing you can do is: switch to console and kill it.
You can also check my sample code (32bit)
https://github.com/graudeejs/asm4BSD
It also has lang/fasm headers for *BSD
I find this https://github.com/graudeejs/asm4BSD/tree/master/FreeBSD/examples/RTU the most interesting example :)
I think it's a bad argument. Install:
x11-themes/qtcurve-gtk2
x11-themes/qtcurve-qt4
additional ports (use as needed):
x11-themes/linux-f10-qtcurve-gtk2
x11-themes/qtcurve-kde3
x11-themes/qtcurve-kde4
and both GTK and QT apps will look the same. I use it, I love it.
Desktop theme should not...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.