Search results

This can help: - https://vermaden.wordpress.com/2023/02/07/print-on-freebsd/

Original article here. Consider this when replying. FreeBSD, The FreeBSD Foundation, and The FreeBSD Forums are not associated with the content of this article.

Yep - just do the same without vm-bhyve. With vm-bhyve its just a lot less PITA.

As I used both Windows 10 and 11 inside Bhyve (and also on physical laptops) I noticed that 11 as a lot slower and less responsive then 10 on the same hardware - does not matter if virtual or physical. As support for 'regular' Windows 10 has ended (with some extension if you did some additional...

Here you have both Windows 10 and Windows 11 covered for Bhyve: - https://vermaden.wordpress.com/2023/08/18/freebsd-bhyve-virtualization/

Bridging does not work with wlan0 device. You need to use NAT with pf(4) for that. Details here: - https://vermaden.wordpress.com/2023/08/18/freebsd-bhyve-virtualization/ Check Laptop WiFi NAT section.

Original article here. Consider this when replying. FreeBSD, The FreeBSD Foundation, and The FreeBSD Forums are not associated with the content of this article.

This will help: - https://github.com/vermaden/scripts/blob/master/storage-wipe-clean.sh

IMHO like that it looks a lot better:

Original article here. Consider this when replying. FreeBSD, The FreeBSD Foundation, and The FreeBSD Forums are not associated with the content of this article.

I would get 'origin' instead. root@bsd15:~ # pkg query '%o %R' | awk '$2=="FreeBSD-ports" {print $1}' sysutils/beadm sysutils/lsblk The xargs(1) command on FreeBSD does not support -a option: root@bsd15:~ # man xargs | grep -- '-a' -n number, --max-args=number So I would use...

Original article here. Consider this when replying. FreeBSD, The FreeBSD Foundation, and The FreeBSD Forums are not associated with the content of this article.

Original article here. Consider this when replying. FreeBSD, The FreeBSD Foundation, and The FreeBSD Forums are not associated with the content of this article.

Seems *this one* is the only allowed XLibre thread. Curious for how long ... as others are closed pretty fast: - https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/open-xlibre-x11-discussion.100840/

Why its not allowed to openly discuss XLibre X11 server on the FreeBSD Forums? First - removal (instead of 'just' locking - which is also really bad) the older XLibre So long Xorg, thanks for all the fish, hello XLibre thread. Copy available here because it was DELETED from FreeBSD Forums...

I would 'kinda understand' locking the thread ... but removing? That is just bad. That is censorship like behavior.

Original article here. Consider this when replying. FreeBSD, The FreeBSD Foundation, and The FreeBSD Forums are not associated with the content of this article.

Original article here. Consider this when replying. FreeBSD, The FreeBSD Foundation, and The FreeBSD Forums are not associated with the content of this article.

I own ThinkPad W520 and it does not have NVMe slot. It has one mSATA slot - 1TB mSATA SSD maximum size. It has one internal 2.5 SATA slot in which you can install up to 8 TB Samsung QVO SSD. It can have additional 2.5 SATA slot in UltraBay. For mSATA - get something from Samsung like EVO for...

There are 800+ Openbox themes here: https://box-look.org/browse?cat=140&ord=rating