Search results for query: ext3

ext4 uses journaling, ext2 and 3 don't. Yes. Standard fsck at boot runs in the background. So you don't even have to wait for it. But this does mean in some case it might fail because fsck can't fix certain issues while it's only doing a backgrounded check. You can turn this on or off if you...

...on powerfailure. Also incase of a power failure, the fsck also quickly completes and fs recovers rather than the full check like ext2 or ext3 which was a time consuming process. Does UFS also has similar behaviour? I have installed 13.1 FreeBSD with disk formatted as UFS. Is Soft updates...

Ahh ok, good to know. I don't have ext2,3 or 4 partition on my FreeBSD. Yep, I think all FUSE user-space solution more slower than built-in module.

You don't need anything FUSE for ext2/ext3/ext4, only FreeBSD's built-in ext2fs. sysutils/fusefs-ext2 isn't really useful on FreeBSD in my opinion, it's slower than the built-in driver and ext3 support was broken last time I tried.

+1, ext2/ext3/ext4 work fine through ext2fs and is what I typically use for USB sticks meant to be used on FreeBSD and Linux machines. sysutils/fusefs-lkl is really broken in my experience (see 265202) and I would avoid it as much as possible. UFS2 is another option if you only need to move...

Maybe you have compression on in XFS but not in ZFS? For the same packages it has been explained to you - Debian is smaller for library-providing packages because it separates out the -dev parts. But that isn't that much in savings, it's just a couple header files and static libraries. If you...

That is a good point. But it still uses up considerably more disk space than Debian ever did for me. Maybe ZFS is a wasteful FS. For example, XFS can store a little more data than ext3 and a lot more than FAT. I may try it again with UFS in the future.

Correct. More specifically newfs will create a new UFS1 or UFS2 filesystem. Yes, DO NOT run newfs on it as it will destroy everything that was on there. That was what I was trying to explain. Try using ext2fs to mount it. For example; mount -t ext2fs /dev/da0s2 /mnt Run tail -F...

I'm confused. <newfs> creates a filesystem anew. the usb-devices that I have in use already contains a filesystem, namely ext3, as I found out. It is Because after hot/pluggin my usb-disk the default kernel is not able to handle the ext3 that I'll tend to get something like "file not found"?

do you apply this command while an usb-disk is attached to the system? and if so... if it is not empty will the content be still readable thereafter? file -s /dev/da0s2 /dev/da0s2: Linux rev 1.0 ext3 filesystem data, UUID=f2cdf150-9f79-40d6-acf1-12a47c0a7be5 (large files)

% pkg search fusefs-ext2 fusefs-ext2-0.0.10_3 FUSE module to mount ext2, ext3 and ext4 with read write support # pkg install fusefs-ext2 # lklfuse -o type=ext4,rw /dev/da0S1 /mnt/GORILLA

...this requires me to have a linux box. I rather create linux file systems on FreeBSD if possible. I'm not able to find any info on how to create ext3/4 file systems to be used for as a flash drive/thumb drive properly on FreeBSD using "ext2fs" from: pkg install e2fsprogs-core So I was able...

For my linux machine, I've been running root on zfs for a while without any issues on Debian. I originally tried to also boot from zfs, but grub's zfs support is sorely painful that I moved the /boot to an ext3 partition.

...https://github.com/lkl/linux/issues/494 There is sysutils/fusefs-ext2, which claims Fuse-ext2 is a multi OS FUSE module to mount ext2, ext3 and ext4 file system devices and/or images with read write support. This is not a recommendation! I don't know that program, never used it. If you use...

...UFS into logical volumes or logical devices. In Linux people do this using LVM (which is a clone of HP-UX LVM) into which they put EXT, EXT2, EXT3, EXT4, or XFS filesystems into logical volumes. Or in Solaris, before ZFS, one would build a Solstice DiskSuite volume (a rudimentary thing like...

...more recently. Ufs runs really clean, unless there's a major power surge or harddisk damage. Files usually recover from improper shutdowns. I try to avoid those. If someone can show a setup that gives comparable performance and checks, that would be good. Ext3 may be a better target [than...

...I don't lose things with it. I lost every data file I had on ext4 on FreeBSD. If someone can show a setup that offers similar performance for ext3 or ext4 to that of UFS on FreeBSD, that would be interesting. But don't put important information or files that took work to make on it. Edit...

...even when I was careful. i did my best to close the open files and unmount the filesystem before a reboot, and files would still get corrupted. ext3 is supposed to be better, but I expect the same problem. I don't remember if ext2 was journaled or not. UFS kept files maintained...

...shutdown. Improper shutdowns aren't supposed to happen, but the files are still supposed to be more resilient than that. Not sure if ext2 or ext3 are better on this. ext4 is good for an intermediary between FreeBSD and Linux, but not for long term storage. sysutils/e2fsprogs would be needed...

...hw.acpi.video.lcd0.economy: 50 hw.acpi.video.lcd0.fullpower: 100 hw.acpi.video.lcd0.brightness: 100 hw.acpi.video.lcd0.active: 1 hw.acpi.video.ext3.active: 1 hw.acpi.video.ext2.active: 1 hw.acpi.video.ext1.active: 1 hw.acpi.video.ext0.active: 1 hw.acpi.battery.info_expire: 5...