Search results for query: docker

We're primarily a Red Hat shop. If Red Hat has deprecated it, it's deprecated. We don't install anything on RHEL that isn't RHEL or Oracle without the client's security officer approval. I don't care about the politics of monetization. Whatever is, is. Professionally, I don't care.

You are the one spreading FUD.

Kubernetes replaces Docker only in Docker Swarm & Docker Compose. And docker-compose is more than enough for most use-cases, and can be used from podman. I haven't felt the need to use k8s or even the more lightweight k3s at all. Docker spawned most of the application container ecosystem and...

Docker isn't "deprecated" or "superseded". What you are experiencing is Google and RedHat and countless others spreading FUD and sleazewords to ensure they get your (and your client's) money instead of Mirantis. The reality is that Docker, Podman, Kubernetes are all silly things that monetize well.

A lot of people still use docker as the container format for Kubernetes. Lots of tools and kind of convenient. To say that docker was replaced by Kubernetes is missing a couple of points.

Docker was not designed for that lol.

At $JOB we don't offer docker services to clients. First, docker is deprecated and no longer supported (by us) on RHEL. Clients may use podman, but only in development and test. When their microservices applications become production they must move their apps to an OpenShift cluster. There we...

Orchestration is one function of Infrastructure-as-code. Something Docker is terribly bad at.

Who told you Ansible is used for orchestration of anything? Ansible is for configuration management. Sigh.

...the goalpost now huh? They switched to Linux for its driver support. This was explicitly stated on their forums. Besides, Ansibles replaces Docker/Kubernetes for orchestration related tasks. We don't have to switch to an entirely different tool. With Jail Native Computing, companies can...

Exactly. It's difficult to distinguish if a person really means Docker - the product or company - or uses the term Docker to describe Linux containers. Docker is legacy, and whenever I talk to CEOs, managers or someone else not very knowledgeable about the container ecosystem in Linux these...

...on this thread trying to tell us what everyone already knows? We already chose FreeBSD because it better fits our use-cases. Containers yes; Docker no. No-one is disputing that containers are good (Many of us use Jails daily). But this thread (via the title) is specifically about Docker...

since the FreeBSD community always emphasizes Netflix I assume most here know the company. They heavily rely on Linux containers, most of their work is being done with applications contained in Linux containers.

Docker got superseded by Kubernetes. Guess which vendor migrated from FreeBSD to Linux to be able to run Kubernetes workloads? You clearly don't know the industry, so I won't waste any more time on this thread.

...secure containment of applications or in-house services for your customers in production; you should be using FreeBSD. It's one differentiating and practical reason to switch to it. I have yet to see Docker used in production at scale for any web facing service. "On my laptop" simply doesn't...

No. What I stated above still stands fine. Perhaps double check. Again, I think you are misunderstanding. "OCI is not Docker+DockerHub" "Docker {...} to run that on other platforms, thats where virtualization comes in." "podman {...} We have projects like Focker. But thats not enough for what...

You're mixing and confusing lots of different things. Podman is docker-cli compatible and reuses lots of code from Docker. You can run FreeBSD containers with it. OCI is the Open Container Initiative. It's a set of standards or specifications that Docker adheres to.

You can't make this s**t up. Cross-platform in the Linux community means, between Ubuntu, RHEL, Oracle Linux, SLES, etc. It's all the same s**t. It's hilariously stupid. Ugh. lol

I think some people don't realize it is just our LinuxEmu at play to run Docker/Linux. And OCI is not Docker+DockerHub so people don't care. Might as well just use a Jail in that case. This is basically it (or at least Docker marketing). Their angle is "cross platform server management" so I...

...Linux has more market share and influence in the enterprise. I'm talking about the technology itself. Someone can replace all of this (which is really just a management layer) with bastilleBSD and Ansible. Docker is not (or at least a flavor of) Unix Containers. Linux marketing has confused you.