Search results

Have you updated your ports tree?

[INFO]: import of clang/LLVM to happen on June 9th: It might be ready for testing. The post wasn't really clear though.

Can you post the details of how you did it?

Yes, do remove CFLAGS. They cause more trouble than they're worth. Flags for optimization are automatically used.

Does buildworld work if ccache is disabled?

PicoBSD isn't in development anymore. Consider using NanoBSD instead.

Perhaps there's no UDP load balancer due to the fact that most people simply use DNS round robin to achieve this and failover.

I'm using SpamAssassin on a mail server that's been in production for approximately 6 months now. It's running RELENG_8_0 and bayes is in use. So far, no serious problems have popped up. However, I'm not using any database backends. Perhaps the port maintainer might be able to help out.

I only have one thing left to suggest then. Use PF for load balancing incoming connections. This does have some limitations, but it should be able to work well for what you need. Some references: Load Balance Incoming Connections TRANSLATION EXAMPLES

Is there a reason why domain names can't be used instead?

I've always wondered why it isn't possible to limit incoming traffic with PF. It is because of implementation difficulties or something similar? Wget can limit the download speed with --limit-rate though.

Try tweaking the DNS settings. It's much simpler. Do something like: For DNS: dig +short google.com ns ns4.google.com. ns2.google.com. ns1.google.com. ns3.google.com. For NTP: dig +short 0.pool.ntp.org a 140.112.2.189 210.68.16.24 123.204.57.143

+1 for VLC. It's excellent.

A similar case would be parallel builds (-j flag when using make). Increasing the number does speed things up, but there's a limit. When you go over it, things just stay the same or slow down dramatically.

Thanks for the pointer. I've been using Ports for quite a while now, and I didn't know that the knobs are documentated there.

Check out dump, restore, and this howto: Backup.

dd just copies the data directly from the disks. Don't think it would work.

There is some ongoing work to virtualize the network stack for Jails. However, it isn't complete yet (if I remember correctly), so SirDice's method is probably the only way right now.

I've also encountered this problem before. I worked around it by using the file manager under GNOME. The delete works flawlessly.

I believe the standard-supfile varies according to the version your using: [dennylin93@cnmc ~]> uname -a FreeBSD cnmc.tw 8.0-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 #0: Thu Jan 7 15:21:05 CST 2010 root@cnmc.tw:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CNMC amd64 [dennylin93@cnmc ~]> grep tag...