yay
That's exactly what it is. Back in the day when they floated the idea of Wayland the consensus among Linux gamers was that X did not offer the same gaming performance as gaming on Windows did. Windows allowed games to write directly to graphic card RAM while with X only the Xserver could write to the frame buffer, through the kernel. And apps must communicate with the Xserver through the X protocol. All this takes time. This is what the gamers complained about. And so here we are.I like the simplicity of the Wayland Linux display system in many ways (it feels a bit like writing graphical software for MS-DOS again). But I don't feel that Wayland will have a substantial enough ecosystem worth committing time to until after our grandkids professional lifetime.
Wayfire has zoom plugin (by default: <Super> + mouse scroll). labwc has ToggleMagnify action. Some others can probably use hyprpicker.I still cannot find magnifier which works just as Mag plugin
I've tried zoom plugin of Wayfire, but it was not what I want. Screen around mouse cursor was magnified on rectangle and fixed size/position.Wayfire has zoom plugin (by default: <Super> + mouse scroll). labwc has ToggleMagnify action. Some others can probably use hyprpicker.
This is because you have a suitable video card. Those who use old Nvidia cards can forget about wayland, because Nvidia drivers 390 and 470 do not support wayland.i have been using Wayland since last December with no issues at all
Same here. But I don't use Linux anymore because I don't like the direction it's going.I use wayland on linux.
Been using Wayland with Gnome on Fedora Linux for probably 2 years now. Zero issues. Xwayland works fine too. But this may really be Fedora's thing that its Wayland implementation is that good.I use wayland on linux.
On FreeBSD it does not work with my nvidia card.
Before I switched to FreeBSD, I used Arch Linux and pretty much only wayland. I didn't have any problems with Wayland either.Been using Wayland with Gnome on Fedora Linux
Interop is a "pro" and a "con" depending on your use-case. But if you isolate the Xauthority MIT cookie you can find a good compromise.Any app can spy on any app.
If browsers were less scummy then the next bastion is the display server. But at this point, X11 IPC is the least of our worries.I want something I can trust for online banking.
I figure any app can spy on anything regardless of OS.X11 is an unholy mess of security bugs. Any app can spy on any app. I want something I can trust for online banking.