1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Debian pushes development of kFreeBSD port

Discussion in 'General' started by vivek, Oct 7, 2009.

  1. vivek

    vivek New Member

    Messages:
    809
    Thanks Received:
    184
    Quoting from the Debian GNU/Linux page:
    http://www.debian.org/News/2009/20091007

    Wow so Linux user will get Jails and other cool FreeBSD features. What do you think?
     
  2. DutchDaemon

    DutchDaemon Administrator Staff Member Administrator Moderator

    Messages:
    10,765
    Thanks Received:
    1,870
    I think that the BSD license is better for GNU/Linux than the GPL license is for BSD ;)
     
  3. fonz

    fonz Active Member

    Messages:
    2,564
    Thanks Received:
    354
    Not that I'm a big fan of Debian, but I do think it'll be interesting to see how this works out.

    Alphons
     
  4. vivek

    vivek New Member

    Messages:
    809
    Thanks Received:
    184
    I forgot about ZFS :e You can now have it on Linux without using 3rd party stuff.
     
  5. Antti

    Antti New Member

    Messages:
    14
    Thanks Received:
    1
    That would not be a Linux, it's GNU/kFreeBSD.
     
  6. SirDice

    SirDice Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    17,622
    Thanks Received:
    2,384
    I'm not so sure about that. As far as I've been able to tell it's only the kernel. The rest of the system (userland binaries) is GNU.

    http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu/
     
  7. aragon

    aragon New Member

    Messages:
    2,031
    Thanks Received:
    252
    I wonder about libc?

    And I wonder if it runs linux binaries, or FreeBSD binaries...
     
  8. SirDice

    SirDice Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    17,622
    Thanks Received:
    2,384
    They're probably the same source but compiled for the FreeBSD kernel. The page I referred to talks about glibc which is basically the GNU version of our libc.

    As I understood it the way an API is called is slightly different between linux and freebsd. So code has to be specifically compiled for a certain kernel.
     
  9. Eponasoft

    Eponasoft New Member

    Messages:
    218
    Thanks Received:
    10
    Now that just sounds perverse.:x
     
  10. CodeBlock

    CodeBlock New Member

    Messages:
    218
    Thanks Received:
    11
    Agreed... These types of projects I find a waste.. If you like BSD use BSD.. If you don't then stick with what you like. I see no point in trying to port BSD's goodies over to Linux. If you like, for example, ports, then use BSD.

    Same things with Gentoo/FreeBSD... just stupid, in my opinion.
     
  11. phoenix

    phoenix Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    3,446
    Thanks Received:
    769
    Heh, if you mis-pronounce it, it comes out "nuke freebsd".
     
  12. rghq

    rghq New Member

    Messages:
    77
    Thanks Received:
    7
    It's just a FreeBSD Kernel with a GNU userland around and all it's disadvantages.
    Dunno but one of the advantages of BSD is things come from one source + the ports as 3rd party applications.

    Already tried it in a VM still I prefer FreeBSD
     
  13. dennylin93

    dennylin93 New Member

    Messages:
    784
    Thanks Received:
    104
    This looks interesting, although I think I'll still stick to FreeBSD.
     
  14. hansivers

    hansivers New Member

    Messages:
    35
    Thanks Received:
    5
    UPDATE
    ======

    ZFS is now available in Debian/kFreeBSD, Sid (unstable) :

    http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/2010/09/#7
     
  15. UNIXgod

    UNIXgod New Member

    Messages:
    1,089
    Thanks Received:
    195
    I realize the k if for kernel or kde. But every time I see that I think kthxbye!
     
  16. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

  17. d_mon

    d_mon New Member

    Messages:
    151
    Thanks Received:
    4
    me 2!
     
  18. vertexSymphony

    vertexSymphony New Member

    Messages:
    79
    Thanks Received:
    13
    It's not Linux (that's only the kernel), but that's just GNU userland + FreeBSD Kernel ...
    this is interesting, it remembers me to nexenta ... comparing it to FreeBSD is dummy, because there you have some GNU/Debian goodies that simplifies management (like apt), sounds interesting ... (It may be a good thing for people more used to Debian style, that wants to have cool stuff from FreeBSD like ZFS and Jails "for free")

    But, as a user already said : I personally prefer FreeBSD anyways
     
  19. tty3

    tty3 New Member

    Messages:
    18
    Thanks Received:
    2
    About this fm kFreeBSD, is a stupid
    Be a simply, use freebsd
     
  20. DutchDaemon

    DutchDaemon Administrator Staff Member Administrator Moderator

    Messages:
    10,765
    Thanks Received:
    1,870
    tty3, can you look into different translation software / websites? Your posts are sometimes quite hard to understand (and I'm being friendly).
     
  21. tty3

    tty3 New Member

    Messages:
    18
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Exist private messages...
     
  22. Dereckson

    Dereckson New Member

    Messages:
    63
    Thanks Received:
    15
    According the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD why, there is a jails and (as hansivers have stated) ZFS support.

    So the advantages for Debian people could be to have the system they want (ie their GNU userland) with a centralized /dev, ZFS and pf support.

    UNIXgod, according this FAQ, k is for kernel.
     
  23. saxon3049

    saxon3049 New Member

    Messages:
    208
    Thanks Received:
    14
    Do you think this could be a way for the serious debian people to move away from what debain has kinda become i.e. ubuntu? I only ask this as when I talk to a serious debian user they always have this pained look on there face when ever you mention ubuntu if not followed immediately with the words " is a dog's dinner".
     
  24. ChalkBored

    ChalkBored Member

    Messages:
    135
    Thanks Received:
    33
    Not really, as soon as the bugs are worked out of the process, someone will inevitably make an Ubuntu version.
     
  25. PetrusValidus

    PetrusValidus New Member

    Messages:
    15
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Interesting question. I use Debian primarily, coming from Ubuntu and Mandriva. While the latter is built from Debian Unstable it lacks the quality that Debian Proper is known for. For some reason or another some Debian users dislike (or even hate) Ubuntu. I don't get that mindset. Ubuntu is for people new to Linux, most likely coming from Windows. One may be based on the other but they have completely different missions and reasons for existence.

    I like FreeBSD and I think it's a great OS but I don't have a pressing need for it right now. Would I be interested in trying kFreeBSD? Sure. I'd have a familiar user environment but with the features, stability, and quality of the FreeBSD kernel.