1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Debian + FreeBSD 7.2 Kernel - Benchmarking Debian's GNU/kFreeBSD

Discussion in 'Off-Topic' started by Penel, Jan 19, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Penel

    Penel New Member

    Messages:
    19
    Likes Received:
    0
    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=debian_kfreebsd&num=1

    So I just finished reading this article and I dont know what to think.....

    I could careless about Phoronixs Linux benchmarks, because we all know they are geared towards the Linux users hehe ;) However,

    I dont understand why Debian is trying to re-create the wheel when they can just drop what they are doing and change their trade-name/distribution-name to "GOTO http://www.freebsd.org/ " LOL

    I like Debian as a pure Linux distro, but this will be interesting too see how everything will play out :)
     
  2. graudeejs

    graudeejs Member

    Messages:
    4,594
    Likes Received:
    0
    One thing that pissed me off is
    http://wiki.debian.org/Debian_GNU/kFreeBSD_why

    And link to FreeBSD mailinglist.... kFreeBSD developers have nothing to do with that AFAIK

    Uhhh, those bastards


    Also I think this post should be in Off Topic section ;)
     
  3. GPF

    GPF New Member

    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    0
    I concur, the wiki page that lists the reasons why someone would choose Debian kFreeBSD over FreeBSD is -to put lightly- a joke.

    Let's wait and see what will happen, although I have my doubts if this idea is going to work out and attract a lot of users.
     
  4. LateNiteTV

    LateNiteTV New Member

    Messages:
    391
    Likes Received:
    0
    lol the reasons to use kfreebsd as opposed to freebsd are ridiculous.
     
  5. Daisuke_Aramaki

    Daisuke_Aramaki New Member

    Messages:
    220
    Likes Received:
    0
    Precisely. I was just about to say that. It looks like they simply had no clue how to rationalize the existence of kfreebsd crap on the first place. :e
     
  6. sqlpython

    sqlpython New Member

    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi people maybe I can shed some light on your confoundings (as in surprise & confusion)..
    Please don't start a flame war over this observation/opinion as I am truely attempting to show the other side. :)
    I am a 15 year Linux User/Developer and have used PCBSD for about 5 years... True I haven't installed FreeBSD since 1996... Currently, I have been investigating an install of GNU/kfreebsd 8.1 myself..
    So, let me help by first getting all misgivings out of the way by saying..........
    Linux is a Slow, Bloated, Unstable, BUG ridden, Inferior OS that will cause God himself to forsake you (if one is to use it.) I have it on good authority that God is a FreeBSD user.. :) ..maybe that will break the tension..

    The reasons for creating and Using a GNU/kfreebsd are as follows:
    1. It allows a uninitiated Users a Simpler install vehicle to a FreeBSD kernel.. (as PCBSD)
    2. As there are multiple BSDs this is just another Choice to help Draw in BSD users.
    3. As a Bridge those that are familiar with Linxu Working/File Structure can Learn BSD commands.
    4. Most Users are stingy with time investment ..GNU/kfreebsd minimizes that....
    5. A simple Linux GUI for additional Software sans Portage..
    6. A deeper pool of Hardware Drivers..Again drawing in more New potiential BSD Users..
    ..........So it is all about Experimentation and New Users...........
    It goes on but it is all about the New the unfamiliar Masses that would be the a thriving new BSD base..
    The difference between the avg BSD user and the avg. Linux user is that the BSD user has to be willing and eventually able to take on manual configurations of all sorts..
    So, please don't be offended. Be at least interested and perhaps this will wet the appetite of Users that will go on to become genuine BSD users..

    P.S. I have been reading and searching these forums for many years but never had a need to post. I can only hope that this post is of some value.
     
  7. graudeejs

    graudeejs Member

    Messages:
    4,594
    Likes Received:
    0
    We need to take advantage of Debian/kFreeBSD in form of drivers :)
     
  8. oliverh

    oliverh New Member

    Messages:
    557
    Likes Received:
    0
    Do you think it will be easier, just because it's ripped off FreeBSD kernel in a "GNU-environment"? Debian maintains a lot of projects, guess why they need a couple of years to get things done at all.
     
  9. DutchDaemon

    DutchDaemon Administrator Staff Member Administrator Moderator

    Messages:
    10,644
    Likes Received:
    20
    In my opinion, PCBSD (KDE) and GhostBSD (Gnome, a forum user's project), and anything interfacing with the new bsdinstall (replacing sysinstall) is about as far as FreeBSD needs to move 'to draw in users'. FreeBSD has never been about gaining desktop user market share, really.
     
  10. Pushrod

    Pushrod New Member

    Messages:
    280
    Likes Received:
    0
    If that's true, then a few scripts or GUI tools in FreeBSD ports would achieve that goal.

    Other than this very post, I have given Debian/kFreeBSD absolutely no thought or consideration, nor do I intend to.
     
  11. sqlpython

    sqlpython New Member

    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    I can respect that ......
    However remember this FreeBSD like every other OS will forever lose particular Users every year. While these Users will never return it is Growth via Marketing/Interest that keeps FreeBSD from perishing.
    The Growth generated/facilitated by Interest. In business you Grow or Perish..simple economics. A neutral Growth business Dies. So, Let all FreeBsd users bow their heads in thanks for the likes of PCBSD, GhostBSD or DesktopBSD as the the interest generated by those variations surely helped new users move on to swell your ranks...
    Anyway as I have said I can understand your view point..
    Different goals for Different folks
     
  12. DutchDaemon

    DutchDaemon Administrator Staff Member Administrator Moderator

    Messages:
    10,644
    Likes Received:
    20
    I know that you are of the opinion that GNU/kFreeBSD would swell FreeBSD's ranks. I am not of that opinion at all. That the derivative FreeBSD versions would eventually move people to 'FreeBSD-proper' (for non-desktop applications, or for more personalized desktop environments ('roll your own' installations)) .. sure -- this is already happening when people want to break out of the confines of these derivatives. But I can't see any positive spin-off emanating from the Debian project. It looks rather self-serving to me.
     
  13. Crivens

    Crivens Member

    Messages:
    826
    Likes Received:
    1
    Sorry mate, the posting started really good, but some of your points do not make much sense to me. Maybe it is me, but I can not take them seriously.

    As will the Linux user when he wants something from his system which $DISTRO has no support for. Like blacklisting some drivers for hardware and then telling the system again and again to not load them because the update mechanisms are often as smart as ... well, as dumb as it can get. That was one reason why I no longer use Linux.

    I am sorry to say so, but I feel unable to comment on the other points witout being offended and/or offensive. This project looks more like "have solution, seek problem" to me. It could have the reasons you mention, but it could as well have other reasons. It will further fragment the Linux area and do the same to FreeBSD. Who would want that?
     
  14. oliverh

    oliverh New Member

    Messages:
    557
    Likes Received:
    0
    >However remember this FreeBSD like every other OS will forever lose particular Users every year.

    Linux on the Desktop has got no relevance at all, forget about the hype. It's an Apple and Microsoft dominated world. However, it's quite a different story on servers. Linux dominates this market, but *BSD is going strong in different areas ... think of quality instead of quantity.
     
  15. sqlpython

    sqlpython New Member

    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    OK, Keep in mind that I am not attempting to convince anyone. Just the way a user base works. So I will end it here.
    Besides, Olly keeps getting edited and I don't want to be responsible for his health. :^)

    Seriously, Simply know this as a User/Developer/Moderator I get to exchange thoughts with thousands of people per year on the subject of OSes and...............
    Many find FreeBSD interesting and Compelling but lack the courage to take the leap.
    Projects like PCBSD and even GNU/kfreebsd open a door to allow them an opportunity due to the simplicity of install to touch on a BSD like install..That's all.
    And while purists may not like that some choose to cut their BSD teeth in that way they do. It is all about choices and no one is taking your choices away because of this fact.
    So, relax and let it pass because as Other type newbie BSD users get less then the Welcome aboard here they will go elsewhere for better or worse. As they relay their experiences here you will be left to you needed/wanted common denominator of Users.
    It will work out just fine...for you.
     
  16. Pushrod

    Pushrod New Member

    Messages:
    280
    Likes Received:
    0
    Perhaps the users who are too afraid to try FreeBSD should seek some sort of counseling.
     
  17. nakal

    nakal Member

    Messages:
    206
    Likes Received:
    0
    Oh, people... don't be like that. Debian on FreeBSD kernel is a nice thing, in my opinion. This does not only prove that you can have a GNU system that is portable. It also shows that FreeBSD kernel is great in other scenarios.

    When you think about it as a developer, to have some other kind of userland also a cheap way to test the stability and reliability. Second thing is... people are really interested in FreeBSD there. Third... you get cheap form of advertisement. Fourth... etc..

    Look at the advantages! I would not use this, but it does not mean I should hate it.
     
  18. Crivens

    Crivens Member

    Messages:
    826
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ok, after some sleep I think I should be more clear.
    When this is used as a club to hang over anyone who adds linux-only parts to the Debian codebase, userland and apps - then this is a good thing (tm). That would mean I would support it, but that does not mean I would use it. But for that reason, I would support it.
     
  19. oliverh

    oliverh New Member

    Messages:
    557
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah the same old song "it's too hard". Most people nowadays are thinking Debian is too hard, too old, too $excuse and they're using Ubuntu instead - even on servers. So maybe BSD is dying - a nice running gag by the way - but maybe Debian is dying too. Finally, who cares? BSD today is mostly for people fed up with Linux.
     
  20. sqlpython

    sqlpython New Member

    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nakal, Crivens, Oliverh, Dutchd, killasmurf*
    I was going to make the my last post my final on the thread but.........
    I just wanted to state that we are now all roughly on the same page..
    Let the other variates have their choices it really doesn't effect the FreeBSD Project.
    Redirect non pertinent FreeBSD inquiries to Docs or back to their Source Project. Voila..
    LOL.. not in my life time!
    Spot on... and for some not so much fed up but needing more refinement/quality in their OS..

    Let me say in closing this is not the FreeBSD user group of 15 years ago.. 15 years ago I would have been tarred and feathered and sent out of town tied to a rail for this subject..LOL
    Today it is obvious clearer heads prevail on the Project..
    Thanks for the exchange.
     
  21. sossego

    sossego New Member

    Messages:
    1,444
    Likes Received:
    0
    Debian/kFreeBSD is a project that should be separated from both Linux and FreeBSD.

    It is not a system for the beginning user.

    Is there any positive use that can be gained from this?
    Yes. More programs. Native over compat. Xorg for Debian and Xorg for native if there are two cards.
    Visually impaired users can use ADRIANE and emacspeak.

    Any reason why it shouldn't be used?
    Ye Olde Lycense Lourds are not happy with the project.
    Maintenance is not easy. The user is running two systems, not one.
    No UFS2 support. There is no FreeBSD default security options. There is no Linux kernel support for security. There is no community forum dedicated to the project.

    Does removing drivers from the kernel source help? Nope.
    Someone can just rebuild from source.


    Any operating system can be used on the Desktop providing that the proper applications and configurations are available.
    Any operating system can be used as a server providing the proper setup and applications are available.


    This is the official FreeBSD forum site.


    There's a lot that the Debian/kFreeBSD project can accomplish.


    You may ignore me now.
     
  22. phoenix

    phoenix Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    3,407
    Likes Received:
    1
    FreeBSD kernel is FreeBSD kernel is FreeBSD kernel. Meaning that the drivers are the same regardless of what you put on top. Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is not going to magically add new drivers, since it's still the same FreeBSD kernel as we (normal FreeBSD users) use.
     
  23. jrm

    jrm Member

    Messages:
    780
    Likes Received:
    0
    That would make an awesome signature/T-shirt.
     
  24. kpedersen

    kpedersen New Member

    Messages:
    853
    Likes Received:
    0
    I believe Debian's GNU/kFreeBSD to be detrimental to the FreeBSD project because instead of bright people working solely on FreeBSD, their hard work is now going to be spread between the two projects.

    You can see this happening in linux and one of the most beneficial points of FreeBSD is everything is developed in one place (one tree). Because Debian's kFreeBSD is not developed in one place I don't feel it should even be allowed to use FreeBSD in it's name.
    Debian GNU/BSD sounds a little contradicting but is "most correct"
     
  25. graudeejs

    graudeejs Member

    Messages:
    4,594
    Likes Received:
    0
    Never say never
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.