Hi.
I recently tried 10-ALPHA5 and found smbfs is broken.
After some builds and tests in VirtualBox, I could figure out it started broken until r255138 in head, and not fixed. (Also in recently branched stable/10)
After above commit, volumes mounted with smbfs is quite unstable in large directory.
(Mostly OK for small directory containing a few files and directories, but directories containing about 100 files and some directories, even
Reverting r255138 fixes the problem, but alternatively, it seems that applying attached diff mostly fixes the problem, too.
(Not mesasured but I feel the latter slower, but original 5 * hz should be 5 seconds)
Can someone confirm and send-pr? I currently have no disclosable email address.
I recently tried 10-ALPHA5 and found smbfs is broken.
After some builds and tests in VirtualBox, I could figure out it started broken until r255138 in head, and not fixed. (Also in recently branched stable/10)
After above commit, volumes mounted with smbfs is quite unstable in large directory.
(Mostly OK for small directory containing a few files and directories, but directories containing about 100 files and some directories, even
ls
does not shows its contents properly, accidentally traverses to subdirectories and drop many files)Reverting r255138 fixes the problem, but alternatively, it seems that applying attached diff mostly fixes the problem, too.
(Not mesasured but I feel the latter slower, but original 5 * hz should be 5 seconds)
Can someone confirm and send-pr? I currently have no disclosable email address.