1d19e
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Storage Place to ask questions about partitioning, labelling, filesystems, encryption or anything else related to storage area. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hello, I am new user on FreeBSD. I am testing using vmware. My problem is insert new disk to zpool because hdd server need more space
,This capture zfs list ![]() This my command for create partition on da1 Code:
gpart create -s gpt da1 gpart add -t freebsd-zfs -l disk2 da1 Code:
zpool get bootfs tank zpool set bootfs="" tank zpool get bootfs tank zpool add tank /dev/gpt/disk2 zpool status tank zpool set bootfs=tank tank zpool get bootfs tank and than Code:
zpool list df -h Code:
tank:/boot/kernel/kernel"
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Read your signup email bo0t. When your post is held for moderation, don't post it again and again. Simply wait for a moderator to release it.
__________________
Senior UNIX Engineer at Unix Support Nederland Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
You can't add a second drive to a ZFSonRoot system unless you are creating a mirror.
__________________
Powered by BareBSD |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
thx for reply |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
, is there any reference links should I read to do it that way ..
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
There is a way to add a single hard drive (or vdev) on an existing root on zfs setup, it's just not documented well. You have to turn off the bootfs property of the pool before adding the disk and turn it back on after the operation.
I'm assuming the existing disk is ada0 and the new disk is ada1 # zpool set bootfs="" tank# zpool add tank /dev/ada1# zpool set bootfs="whatitwasbefore" tankThe above would give you more storage but no redundancy, in other words a RAID-0 setup. The same could be done to create a mirror with redundancy, the command would be zpool attach # zpool set bootfs="" tank# zpool attach tank /dev/ada0 /dev/ada1# zpool set bootfs="whatitwasbefore" tankRaidZ vdevs can not be created this way, they have to be recreated from scratch. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19253-01/...chy/index.html If you want to setup your system as mirror/raidz and then import the pool. Use this script. http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=35947 |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
thanks for the explanation, I follow the way of the first :
# zpool set bootfs="" tank # zpool add tank /dev/ada1 # zpool set bootfs="whatitwasbefore" tankThis my capture ![]() and then restart the server, ![]() What should I do? Thank you for reply
Last edited by DutchDaemon; December 2nd, 2012 at 19:24. Reason: Formatting & Style: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=8816 / http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=18043 |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
I never made it possible to boot off a striped ZFS system. Has it worked for you?
__________________
Powered by BareBSD |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
My fileserver has a two mirror vdevs striped and it's fully bootable Root on ZFS setup. It was initially two different mirrors, one for system and other one for data but I merged them into one. I didn't do anything special to merge them, I created a second vdev out of the other pair of disks that first cleared of any labels and zpool added them to the pool.
Code:
whitezone ~ % zpool status
pool: zwhitezone
state: ONLINE
status: The pool is formatted using a legacy on-disk format. The pool can
still be used, but some features are unavailable.
action: Upgrade the pool using 'zpool upgrade'. Once this is done, the
pool will no longer be accessible on software that does not support feature
flags.
scan: scrub repaired 0 in 1h46m with 0 errors on Thu Nov 15 00:45:53 2012
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
zwhitezone ONLINE 0 0 0
mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
label/wzdisk0 ONLINE 0 0 0
label/wzdisk1 ONLINE 0 0 0
mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0
label/wzdisk2 ONLINE 0 0 0
label/wzdisk3 ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: No known data errors
whitezone ~ %
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
@kpa,
This is very interesting. Where have you installed the bootcode? I suppose you can boot from wzdisk0 & wzdisk1 only?
__________________
Powered by BareBSD |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
The bootcode is on a separate 2GB IDE plug SSD, basically it's a GPT partitioned disk with only one freebsd-boot partition. I did have a set up where I had a separate freebsd-boot partitions on the first two data disks for the boot code and it worked fine. I then got rid of partitions on the data disks alltogether.
I believe if I had wanted I could have had partitions for bootcode on all four disks and I would have been able to boot from an y of them using the BIOS F12 boot menu. The current set up is the best compromise for me, there is no need to have partitions on the data disks and it's still a full Root on ZFS system. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Powered by BareBSD |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
The freebsd-boot partition is only 128k, rest is used for swap.
There is no separate /boot partition or dataset, /boot is on the zwhitezone/ROOT/freebsd dataset that is the rootfs on the system. I don't know why it says the pool is using older version of metadata, it's a version 28 pool. Maybe something is slightly broken on 9-STABLE at the moment... I only just noticed this after updating. |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
The ability to have the boot code on a separate disk or USB stick is quite nifty as it saves you from having to put boot code on every disk in the root pool (you can even uses 'whole disks' in the root pool). I did try it out myself a while back.
The legacy warning in the above output mentions feature flags which are a post-v28 feature. Looks like you actually have a newer version of ZFS (newer than v28) since your last upgrade. |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oh yes, you're right. My dmesg(8) says:
Code:
... ZFS filesystem version: 5 ZFS storage pool version: features support (5000) ... |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well the Sun version numbers are still there but they've move the SPA verison from 28 -> 5000 and it should stay there. This is so if you try and import into Solaris (or any other system running a non feature-flag aware version), you should get a graceful error telling you the version of the pool is not supported. I guess they're hoping Solaris ZFS never gets to pool version 5000.
Before, any new feature that may of made the pool incompatible caused an increase of the pool version. It's a simple way of making sure a pool that *could* have X feature enabled never gets imported into a system that doesn't support X feature (even if you never actually used it). Now any new feature has a 'feature flag' and the pool version stays the same. The benefit is that a feature-flag aware system can import any pool, even if it was created on a system with different or newer features, as long as those features are not used. It's also possible for a pool to be opened read only, as long as any unsupported features in use only affect writing and hasn't changed the disk format. (Basically each feature has an 'any system importing this pool must support this feature' or 'a system without this feature can read this pool but not write' flag). |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [Solved] Boot problem after adding old hard disk to the system | atomant | Storage | 17 | May 22nd, 2012 16:36 |
| [Solved] [FreeNAS] Is a ZFS pool confused when adding disks to a computer? | bengtv | General | 2 | June 11th, 2011 21:51 |
| Monitor issue and adding hard drive | Me2 | System Hardware | 9 | July 7th, 2010 18:24 |
| Replacing a faulty hard drive with/or without destroying the pool | tab2tab | General | 4 | June 7th, 2010 12:49 |
| zfs , adding a usb hard drive to a zpool | wonslung | General | 4 | December 2nd, 2009 04:03 |