16111 Specs Needed - The FreeBSD Forums
The FreeBSD Forums  

Go Back   The FreeBSD Forums > Base System > System Hardware

System Hardware Internal storage, motherboards, PCI cards, stuff inside the case.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 24th, 2012, 12:02
Josh_ZA Josh_ZA is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 12
Thanks: 10
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Specs Needed

Hi all,

I'm thinking of buying a 2nd PC, just to install FreeBSD 9.0 & fool around with the OS. Get to know it. Will probably put Gnome or KDE on.

Specs:
  • 3.2GHZ Intel ( 478 socket )
  • 1GB RAM ( DDR400 )
  • 80GB SATA hdd
  • onboard vga ( These are IBM Thinkcentres )

Now I KNOW this is outdated hardware, but I've searched and cannot find specs needed for FreeBSD 9.0

PLEASE could someone tell me.....

Are these specs way too slow? I know the PC won't be fast, but it's a learning PC for FreeBSD.

These specs can run Gnome right? I'm sorry for asking a question like this, but I really need to know & hope someone will be able to help.

Thx guys!

Last edited by phoenix; July 27th, 2012 at 07:28. Reason: It's 'FreeBSD', no exceptions: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=18043#FreeBSD
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old July 24th, 2012, 12:21
vermaden's Avatar
vermaden vermaden is offline
Giant Locked
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: pl_PL.lodz
Posts: 2,192
Thanks: 59
Thanked 632 Times in 349 Posts
Default

Depends what You want to do with it, FreeBSD can run on 1-core 66Mhz 32MB RAM machine and on a 64-core 3000MHz 128GB RAM machine ...

About Your setup, 1GB RAM is little to low for GNOME/KDE, get at least 2GB, besides that, FreeBSD will run ok.
__________________
Religions, worst damnation of mankind.
"FreeBSD has always been the operating system that GNU/Linux should have been." Frank Pohlmann, IBM
http://vermaden.blogspot.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old July 24th, 2012, 12:30
Josh_ZA Josh_ZA is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 12
Thanks: 10
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thank you for your reply. I just want to learn the commands, basically do everything from the shell.

I just want to use the GUI desktop to check mail on a daily basis, browse the net, run Mumble etc etc

So I think Fluxbox will be ok right? ( With those specs )
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old July 24th, 2012, 12:38
Beastie Beastie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: /dev/earth0
Posts: 1,701
Thanks: 0
Thanked 301 Times in 245 Posts
Default

Definitely. I've run similar window managers on machines with much lower specs than yours.
__________________
May the source be with you!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Beastie For This Useful Post:
Josh_ZA (July 24th, 2012)
  #5  
Old July 24th, 2012, 13:32
SirDice's Avatar
SirDice SirDice is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 13,695
Thanks: 47
Thanked 2,021 Times in 1,860 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh_ZA View Post
I've searched and cannot find specs needed for FreeBSD 9.0
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.0R...-detailed.html
__________________
Senior UNIX Engineer at Unix Support Nederland
Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SirDice For This Useful Post:
Josh_ZA (July 24th, 2012)
  #6  
Old July 24th, 2012, 19:02
vermaden's Avatar
vermaden vermaden is offline
Giant Locked
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: pl_PL.lodz
Posts: 2,192
Thanks: 59
Thanked 632 Times in 349 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh_ZA View Post
So I think Fluxbox will be ok right? ( With those specs )
I have used Fluxbox/Openbox on FreeBSD with 350MHz CPU and 160 MB RAM, along with Opera, Nautilus, GIMP and OpenOffice.

Windows manager will be better sollution for such older box, but it may also provide better desktop, for example I now sit in front of a dual-core 8 GB RAM laptop and still use Openbox because its far better for me then any DE
__________________
Religions, worst damnation of mankind.
"FreeBSD has always been the operating system that GNU/Linux should have been." Frank Pohlmann, IBM
http://vermaden.blogspot.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old July 24th, 2012, 19:07
wblock@'s Avatar
wblock@ wblock@ is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Milky Way galaxy
Posts: 7,701
Thanks: 429
Thanked 1,757 Times in 1,456 Posts
Default

A 3.2GHz P4 is at least as fast as an Atom, and xfce and other lightweight environments are usable on Atom netbooks.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old July 24th, 2012, 23:11
mwatkins mwatkins is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 121
Thanks: 3
Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vermaden View Post
I now sit in front of a dual-core 8 GB RAM laptop and still use Openbox because its far better for me then any DE
Likewise, my desktop is an 8 core 16GB machine and I run x11-wm/dwm most of the time, not because I'm stingy on the amount of RAM used (most of mine sits idle, most of the time) but because I like simple tiling window managers. I even run dwm on my laptop, normally with just one window per virtual desktop, because M-1, M-2, M-3 etc is so convenient for switching "windows".

My machine is largely overkill for what I use it for when running FreeBSD but of course when I do run Windows the extra horsepower is appreciated. The best part of the faster machine on FreeBSD is that building ports is very quick.

When I do want a little more of a desktop environment experience I start up x11-wm/xfce4.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old July 25th, 2012, 06:13
vermaden's Avatar
vermaden vermaden is offline
Giant Locked
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: pl_PL.lodz
Posts: 2,192
Thanks: 59
Thanked 632 Times in 349 Posts
Default

@mwatkins

I sometimes use tiling on Openbox too, in the past I tried pytyle1, wanted to move to pytyle3, but I haven't figured how to make it work on FreeBSD, so I wrote my own tile.sh for tiling windows on Openbox
__________________
Religions, worst damnation of mankind.
"FreeBSD has always been the operating system that GNU/Linux should have been." Frank Pohlmann, IBM
http://vermaden.blogspot.com
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old July 26th, 2012, 13:26
Josh_ZA Josh_ZA is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 12
Thanks: 10
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

**UPDATE**

OK so this is the PC I got... ( For free )

1.7GHz Celeron
256MB DDR400
40GB HDD

This is still ok right? To be used for getting to know the OS. Mostly terminal shell syntax entries ( If I can put it that way )

I would like to run Fluxbox.

Please let me know if this is still ok as opposed to my first post with that system's specs.

& once again, thank you to all who have replied so far.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old July 26th, 2012, 13:37
vermaden's Avatar
vermaden vermaden is offline
Giant Locked
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: pl_PL.lodz
Posts: 2,192
Thanks: 59
Thanked 632 Times in 349 Posts
Default

Its still ok.
__________________
Religions, worst damnation of mankind.
"FreeBSD has always been the operating system that GNU/Linux should have been." Frank Pohlmann, IBM
http://vermaden.blogspot.com
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to vermaden For This Useful Post:
Josh_ZA (July 26th, 2012)
  #12  
Old July 26th, 2012, 15:34
wblock@'s Avatar
wblock@ wblock@ is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Milky Way galaxy
Posts: 7,701
Thanks: 429
Thanked 1,757 Times in 1,456 Posts
Default

For free, it's fine. Additional memory wouldn't hurt.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to wblock@ For This Useful Post:
Josh_ZA (July 26th, 2012)
  #13  
Old July 28th, 2012, 13:34
Josh_ZA Josh_ZA is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 12
Thanks: 10
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thank you so much to all who have replied.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Home Network Specs Simba7 Off-Topic 6 November 20th, 2011 19:55
[Solved] Is dbus really needed? Martillo1 X.Org 9 June 24th, 2011 21:23
laptop specs phyro Mobile Computing 11 May 10th, 2011 21:12
[Solved] Specs for a dedicated FreeBSD Server atwinix System Hardware 12 April 11th, 2011 06:34
How to view hardware specs emadello System Hardware 5 July 17th, 2009 11:39


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:24.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
The mark FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation and is used by The FreeBSD Project with the permission of The FreeBSD Foundation.
Web protection and acceleration provided by CloudFlare
0