16111
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| System Hardware Internal storage, motherboards, PCI cards, stuff inside the case. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi all,
I'm thinking of buying a 2nd PC, just to install FreeBSD 9.0 & fool around with the OS. Get to know it. Will probably put Gnome or KDE on. Specs:
Now I KNOW this is outdated hardware, but I've searched and cannot find specs needed for FreeBSD 9.0 PLEASE could someone tell me..... Are these specs way too slow? I know the PC won't be fast, but it's a learning PC for FreeBSD. These specs can run Gnome right? I'm sorry for asking a question like this, but I really need to know & hope someone will be able to help. Thx guys! Last edited by phoenix; July 27th, 2012 at 07:28. Reason: It's 'FreeBSD', no exceptions: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=18043#FreeBSD |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Depends what You want to do with it, FreeBSD can run on 1-core 66Mhz 32MB RAM machine and on a 64-core 3000MHz 128GB RAM machine ...
About Your setup, 1GB RAM is little to low for GNOME/KDE, get at least 2GB, besides that, FreeBSD will run ok.
__________________
Religions, worst damnation of mankind. "FreeBSD has always been the operating system that GNU/Linux should have been." Frank Pohlmann, IBM http://vermaden.blogspot.com |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thank you for your reply. I just want to learn the commands, basically do everything from the shell.
I just want to use the GUI desktop to check mail on a daily basis, browse the net, run Mumble etc etc So I think Fluxbox will be ok right? ( With those specs ) |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Definitely. I've run similar window managers on machines with much lower specs than yours.
__________________
May the source be with you! |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Beastie For This Useful Post: | ||
Josh_ZA (July 24th, 2012) | ||
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
__________________
Senior UNIX Engineer at Unix Support Nederland Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to SirDice For This Useful Post: | ||
Josh_ZA (July 24th, 2012) | ||
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have used Fluxbox/Openbox on FreeBSD with 350MHz CPU and 160 MB RAM, along with Opera, Nautilus, GIMP and OpenOffice.
Windows manager will be better sollution for such older box, but it may also provide better desktop, for example I now sit in front of a dual-core 8 GB RAM laptop and still use Openbox because its far better for me then any DE
__________________
Religions, worst damnation of mankind. "FreeBSD has always been the operating system that GNU/Linux should have been." Frank Pohlmann, IBM http://vermaden.blogspot.com |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
A 3.2GHz P4 is at least as fast as an Atom, and xfce and other lightweight environments are usable on Atom netbooks.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
My machine is largely overkill for what I use it for when running FreeBSD but of course when I do run Windows the extra horsepower is appreciated. The best part of the faster machine on FreeBSD is that building ports is very quick. ![]() When I do want a little more of a desktop environment experience I start up x11-wm/xfce4. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
@mwatkins
I sometimes use tiling on Openbox too, in the past I tried pytyle1, wanted to move to pytyle3, but I haven't figured how to make it work on FreeBSD, so I wrote my own tile.sh for tiling windows on Openbox
__________________
Religions, worst damnation of mankind. "FreeBSD has always been the operating system that GNU/Linux should have been." Frank Pohlmann, IBM http://vermaden.blogspot.com |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
**UPDATE**
OK so this is the PC I got... ( For free ) 1.7GHz Celeron 256MB DDR400 40GB HDD This is still ok right? To be used for getting to know the OS. Mostly terminal shell syntax entries ( If I can put it that way ) I would like to run Fluxbox. Please let me know if this is still ok as opposed to my first post with that system's specs. & once again, thank you to all who have replied so far. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Its still ok.
__________________
Religions, worst damnation of mankind. "FreeBSD has always been the operating system that GNU/Linux should have been." Frank Pohlmann, IBM http://vermaden.blogspot.com |
| The Following User Says Thank You to vermaden For This Useful Post: | ||
Josh_ZA (July 26th, 2012) | ||
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thank you so much to all who have replied.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Home Network Specs | Simba7 | Off-Topic | 6 | November 20th, 2011 19:55 |
| [Solved] Is dbus really needed? | Martillo1 | X.Org | 9 | June 24th, 2011 21:23 |
| laptop specs | phyro | Mobile Computing | 11 | May 10th, 2011 21:12 |
| [Solved] Specs for a dedicated FreeBSD Server | atwinix | System Hardware | 12 | April 11th, 2011 06:34 |
| How to view hardware specs | emadello | System Hardware | 5 | July 17th, 2009 11:39 |