Jumbo frames and windows mtu size

Sylhouette · #1 October 5th, 2011, 07:53

Hello all.

I am trying to use jumbo frames between my zfs iscsi target and my windows 2003 server

Now i only have two mtu sizes on windows 4088 and 9014

When i set my mtu size on my FreeBSD to the same, it feels like something is wrong.

is windows mtu 9014 the same as 9000 on FreeBSD, if so what is the correct mtu size for 4088 then, it is not 4000, because if i set that, copies to the zfs iscsi target takes more time than the default 1500 value.

regards
Johan Hendriks

**yongari@** · #2 October 5th, 2011, 18:18

Have no experience on Windows server but I believe the meaning of MTU should be the same. Jumbo frame support highly depends on controller and driver quality. Even though both parties use different MTU value, TCP will use advertised MSS so there should be no problem in general.

If you use non-server class controllers you'd better to stick on standard MTU. Server class controllers have better DMA engine and optimized for efficient packet processing for all frame size. Non-server class controllers have several limitations for certain frame size and generally they are tuned for standard MTU. I would choose best MTU value based on experimentation.

For server class controllers, it's normal to see 990Mbps with jumbo frame for bulk TCP transfers. For non-server class controllers, the number would be 940-960Mbps with jumbo frame, so bottle-neck wouldn't be ethernet.

Sylhouette · #3 October 5th, 2011, 18:54

Thanks for your answer.

The nics are two intel desktop cards.
The performance with the default mtu size, is more than acceptable, so i leave it like it is.

Thanks again.

regards,
Johan

RusDyr · #4 November 7th, 2011, 12:37

"it feels like something is wrong" actually very unspecified problem.

I would recommend to check actual size in iSCSI traffic by tcpdump, turn on path mtu discovery temporary.

Savagedlight · #5 November 9th, 2011, 12:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sylhouette

Hello all.
Now i only have two mtu sizes on windows 4088 and 9014
When i set my mtu size on my FreeBSD to the same, it feels like something is wrong.

is windows mtu 9014 the same as 9000 on FreeBSD, if so what is the correct mtu size for 4088 then, it is not 4000, because if i set that, copies to the zfs iscsi target takes more time than the default 1500 value.

Basically, the Windows setting includes the header bytes and the FreeBSD setting does not. If you set it to 9014 on Windows, your FreeBSD setting should be 9000. If you set it to 4088 on Windows, your FreeBSD setting should be (4088-14)=4074.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Max packet size less then MTU value on direct link with BCM5715C	ro	System Hardware	6	September 28th, 2011 01:17
CARP + Jumbo Frames (can't set mtu)	Pfarthing6	Networking	2	June 27th, 2011 19:05
Esp header size, payload size, and trailer size?	jangli656	Networking	3	April 4th, 2011 17:37
Non tagged frames statistics	Antti	Networking	3	November 3rd, 2009 00:35
I can't change the size of the screen on X-windows.	corone	General	1	January 29th, 2009 18:27