c5df
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Installation and Maintenance of FreeBSD Ports or Packages Installing and maintaining the FreeBSD Ports Collection or FreeBSD Packages (i.e. third party software). |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have a fresh, minimal install of FreeBSD 8.2 i386 and it looks like the applications I would like to run are in stable as opposed to release (libreoffice, firefox 4).
1. If I set PACKAGESITE to ****/packages-8-stable/Latest/ do I also need an 8-stable base system? 2. Browsing the forums I found mention of 'bxpkg' in ports. Is it also in the binary package respositories - I just found the bxpkg package in the ftp site 3. Is stable updated daily or is it more like OpenBSD current with periodic updates - I want to avoid getting caught between python updates. Last edited by DutchDaemon; May 4th, 2011 at 00:24. Reason: It's "FreeBSD" |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
1... I'd ncftp to packages-8-stable/www, for instance, to get the latest available, for instance, seamonkey(2) browser... as to Q#3, all are updated as license and hardware resources allow. Maybe seek other posts with long explanations of which there are many.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
1) Usually you don't need to run -stable to use the -stable packages. There can be slight differences between a -STABLE and -RELEASE which could make packages build for -STABLE fail on a -RELEASE but that doesn't happen too often.
2) bxpkg is a GUI frontend to manage packages 3) -STABLE is a continuously moving target. It also has nothing to do with python or any other port. The base OS and the ports system are two separate entities.
__________________
Senior UNIX Engineer at Unix Support Nederland Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks to the above posters I built an OpenBox with libreoffice and firefox4. There were some minor issues with intels cpu speed stepping that where solved by advice elsewhere in the forum.
Looking down the road, I would like to keep the system up-to-date and do not necessarily need a GUI based front end to manage packages. I was hoping for something simple like openbsd's pkg_add -ui I understand that portupgrade -PP will accomplish this. In practice does portupgrade -PP leave one with a working desktop or from a reliability standpoint would it be better to go with bxpkg?It looks like it should be portmaster -PP as pointed out in the next post.
Last edited by DutchDaemon; May 4th, 2011 at 14:12. Reason: portupgrade -> portmaster |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Today, I've run multiple instances of
Code:
portmaster -d -B -i |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Package management at scale | AngusBuchanan | Installation and Maintenance of FreeBSD Ports or Packages | 12 | November 6th, 2011 10:46 |
| Question about package management (in general) | Brentx | Installation and Maintenance of FreeBSD Ports or Packages | 11 | September 23rd, 2009 10:34 |
| Upgrade a binary package | rainman82 | Installation and Maintenance of FreeBSD Ports or Packages | 1 | September 9th, 2009 15:59 |
| Newbie question about package management | blumstng | Installation and Maintenance of FreeBSD Ports or Packages | 14 | July 17th, 2009 22:49 |
| binary package maintenance tool | kamikaze | Installation and Maintenance of FreeBSD Ports or Packages | 6 | May 9th, 2009 14:39 |