I have recently turned my former workstation into a ZFS-based storage server. I have FreeBSD installed on a ZFS mirror on two 250 GB drives with the AHCI driver loaded. Both drives are labeled using glabel (ada0 is labeled as disk01 and ada1 is labeled as disk02).
The drives are GPT partitioned, I followed this guide with regard to the partitioning:
http://www.wirednoize.net/freebsd/index.php?FreeBSD 8.2 Release amd64 pure ZFS install
The zpool consists of disk01p2 and disk02p2.
The labels work fine, and the system seems fine.
When the system boots, and when certain commands relating to the disks are run (Last time I saw this was when I did a zpool scrub) I see the following message:
I have done the installation several times over because I wanted to get a good feel for it, this final time I used glabel as well, and as I would expect, the disk size reported by gpart show was "one" (Not sure what the unit was) less when showing label/disk01 than ada0.
I found the following article written in Russian: http://bu7cher.blogspot.com/2011/03/freebsd-gmirror-gpt-ufs.html
I read it using Google Translate and it seems to indicate that the above is more or a less a safe mismatch as far as I can tell, however not something I wanna rely on (Google Translate is definitely not perfect) ...
Therefore, my question is, can I safely ignore this note from GEOM?
The drives are GPT partitioned, I followed this guide with regard to the partitioning:
http://www.wirednoize.net/freebsd/index.php?FreeBSD 8.2 Release amd64 pure ZFS install
The zpool consists of disk01p2 and disk02p2.
The labels work fine, and the system seems fine.
When the system boots, and when certain commands relating to the disks are run (Last time I saw this was when I did a zpool scrub) I see the following message:
Code:
GEOM: ada0: the secondary GPT header is not in the last LBA.
GEOM: ada1: the secondary GPT header is not in the last LBA.
I have done the installation several times over because I wanted to get a good feel for it, this final time I used glabel as well, and as I would expect, the disk size reported by gpart show was "one" (Not sure what the unit was) less when showing label/disk01 than ada0.
I found the following article written in Russian: http://bu7cher.blogspot.com/2011/03/freebsd-gmirror-gpt-ufs.html
I read it using Google Translate and it seems to indicate that the above is more or a less a safe mismatch as far as I can tell, however not something I wanna rely on (Google Translate is definitely not perfect) ...
Therefore, my question is, can I safely ignore this note from GEOM?