Using different package branch

eincello · #1 February 9th, 2010, 03:48

I want to build a desktop system using packages, but haven't seen this issue addressed directly. The Handbook says you can use PACKAGESITE to grab packages from, say, STABLE, even if you're running RELEASE.

Is this a wise idea? The Handbook only says it's "possible," and I've seen differing opinions from various folks. Plus, the handbook says STABLE is "not a resource for end users," and I'd like to honor that.

In lieu of wanting up-to-date packages, should I just dive in with STABLE? Use STABLE packages on RELEASE? Something else?

Thanks,
Adam

**phoenix** · #2 February 9th, 2010, 06:55

If you are running the latest released minor version (6.4 for 6-STABLE, 7.2 for 7-STABLE, 8.0 for 8-STABLE), then the changes from -RELEASE to -STABLE are generally minor. In that case, you can usually get away with setting PACKAGESITE to use the packages-X-stable/ directory.

If you are running an older-than-last-minor release, then it gets more and more dicey the older you get. Trying to use packages-6-stable on a 6.0 box probably wouldn't work too well.

fbsd1 · #3 February 28th, 2010, 06:17

I use PACKAGESITE whenever the current release has packages missing that were available in the previous release with no problems. Or target the stable packages world hopping the package i want has finaly been recompiled and packaged. Using a 8.0 packages on a 7.0 system or older is just asking for trouble. Same goes for using 5.4 packages on a 7.0 or 8.0 system.

achix · #4 February 28th, 2010, 06:55

The problem arises from the fact that system and ports, by design, are allowed to evolve independently. The problem is inherently hard, one one hand, of course software should evolve even if system stays the same (so, software evolution does not depend on system), while on the other hand, software (and especially compiled software) cannot compile/run outside a specific software/system combination (so software relies heavily on system). This oxymoron is very hard to solve, and i think FreeBSD does a great job to deal with this, while giving the user maximum freedom of choice.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
scite package	wirasto	Installation and Maintenance of FreeBSD Ports or Packages	0	January 28th, 2010 19:11
dtrace6 branch from perforce repository	shrikanth07	FreeBSD Development	0	October 21st, 2009 12:29
Squid package	Myron	Installation and Maintenance of FreeBSD Ports or Packages	8	September 26th, 2009 16:23
Hide my IP with package	mfaridi	Firewalls	8	April 6th, 2009 10:19
Kbdcontrol in which package?	markg	Installing & Upgrading	1	February 22nd, 2009 22:27

The Following User Says Thank You to phoenix For This Useful Post:
eincello (February 9th, 2010)