a18e FreeBSD and hardware monitoring - The FreeBSD Forums
The FreeBSD Forums  

Go Back   The FreeBSD Forums > Development > FreeBSD Development

FreeBSD Development Kernel development, writing drivers, coding, and questions regarding FreeBSD internals.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 21st, 2009, 12:59
tcn tcn is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 48
Thanks: 4
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Post FreeBSD and hardware monitoring

Hi,

I know some work was done in the summer of code 2007 for hardware monitoring (cnst-sensors) which basically is a port of the OpenBSD hardware monitoring system. I also know this work was rejected from the FreeBSD developpement tree due to architectural reasons (I'm not here to discuss this, it has been widely discussed elsewhere and I don't have the knowledge or intent to get an opinion on it).

This framework is now used by many and supports a wide range of hardware. Unfortunatelly for me, this would be the only way I have to get the information from my motherboard (Intel D945GCLF2, Atom330).

I would like to know if there is any plan of taking this work and re-structure it to be FreeBSD architecturally friendly or to incorporate it in the present coretemp (which BTW does not return proper temperature in my case (-1 is not valid in either Kelvin or degrees celcius, one degree might not be an actual one degree and virtual cores (HyperThread) are way off). Also, knowing the speed at which fans are operating would be very nice.

Hardware monitoring suffers in FreeBSD and I believe it has become an essential tool to evaluate server's health and for diagnostics.

Thanks,

tcn
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old December 21st, 2009, 16:11
oliverh's Avatar
oliverh oliverh is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 557
Thanks: 51
Thanked 36 Times in 33 Posts
Default

>I also know this work was rejected from the FreeBSD developpement tree due to architectural reasons (I'm not here to discuss this, it has been widely discussed elsewhere and I don't have the knowledge or intent to get an opinion on it).

No, just because of _one_ developer. Some people say because of 'politics' (OpenBSD ....)

http://www.leidinger.net/blog/2009/1...s-for-freebsd/

Quote:
As I was committing a port of the OpenBSD sensors framework (produced as part of the Google Summer of Code 2007) to FreeBSD and had to remove it afterwards because one committer complained very loudly, I was asked what the status of this is.

The short status is: Nobody is doing something about it.
I think this is a rather good answer to your question.
__________________
What was the goal of the Linux community--to replace Windows? One can imagine higher aspirations., Bill Joy
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oliverh For This Useful Post:
tcn (December 22nd, 2009)
  #3  
Old December 22nd, 2009, 12:44
tcn tcn is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 48
Thanks: 4
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

ouch!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Monitoring Bandwidth atwinix Networking 4 October 14th, 2009 00:06
Wireless hardware for FreeBSD 7 blumstng System Hardware 5 October 13th, 2009 14:43
Hardware for FreeBSD for web site colocation? Lobster System Hardware 13 May 22nd, 2009 06:37
(Re) Installing FreeBSD after hardware swap grocer Installing & Upgrading 6 April 25th, 2009 21:29
FreeBSD on Soekris Hardware dann System Hardware 3 February 26th, 2009 19:21


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:33.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
The mark FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation and is used by The FreeBSD Project with the permission of The FreeBSD Foundation.
Web protection and acceleration provided by CloudFlare
0