1f43e
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Storage Place to ask questions about partitioning, labelling, filesystems, encryption or anything else related to storage area. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi,
I also tried my luck with ZFS on FreeBSD - 9.0-RELEASE Intel® Core™ i5 CPU 760 @ 2.80GHz (4xCore) 64 bit 8GB RAM 4GB file based swap Now, obviously one can read lots of things, tips and tweaks for FreeBSD System in order to use ZFS "proper". Now, some of those things you'll fall over the most when reading are basically the following four sysctl nodes in order to get a stable system without kernel panics:
Please correct me if I'm wrong here but as far as I understood those variables is that vfs.zfs.arc_* sets the frame/boundaries for the Layer 1 cache of ZFS. vfs.zfs.arc_min is what system should always keep full while vfs.zfs.arc_max represents buffer for higher loads. Also this Layer 1 cache depends and acts within the given frame of vm.kmem_size. Basically to be on the same page here
Now some people advice you to give vm.kmem_size upto 16GB on a 8GB RAM system. This sounds absurd to me since system can not even make use of 16GB since there is only 8GB RAM installed?! Or would this mean you also need a 8GB swap in order to not run out of pages here? Basically my intuition tells me to let vm.kmem_size = Installed RAM. In fact I figured FreeBSD automatically defaults vm.kmem_size to 94% of hw.realmem - which sounds healthy - while the default vm.kmem_size_max = 314572.8 MB just doesn't sound healthy to me?! Why such a big number? Where should all this be stored in such a "worst case scenario"? Wouldn't it sound more reasonalbe to let vm.kmem_size_max = 94% of hw.realmem PLUS the amount of currently setup swap file's/drive's size? Is there any reasons against my theory? Anyway, after some tests I figured to get kernel panics under control by decreasing vfs.zfs.arc_max to 4G (50% of my RAM) and at the same time increase vfs.zfs.arc_min to 1G (12.5% of my RAM). Now fine, I don't have kernel Panics anymore (right now) - but note that at the same time there is a samba DC, apache, and some other services running on the system as well - and frankly I'm afraid that the system may run into a kernel panic again as soon as those service get some higher load ... ;/ - which is totally unacceptable for a productive system! This doesn't give me butterflies in my stomach - in fact it makes me feel like FreeBSD's memory management is not well enough off to deal with high load, since I expect it to let a lower prio app wait until the higher prio one finished its work?! But I'm probably just missing out on the right sysctl variables to restrict/prevent kernel panics at all. Is there any suggestions for this based on facts? Or how Can I make sure other services don't disturb ZFS and the other way around and at the same time make full use of given RAM resources? So how do we milk this cow? ![]() Thanks Last edited by phoenix; May 1st, 2012 at 17:51. Reason: Minor spelling nits and typos. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Why more than physical RAM? I don't get it? Isn't that provoking a panic? Last edited by Leander; May 1st, 2012 at 20:35. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
The kmem* parameters are not actual amounts of memory but size parameters for a virtual address space where pages of memory (4KB units in i386 and amd64) can be mapped from the physical memory anywhere within the address range. This virtual address space will mostly consist of unused large gaps between small areas of used memory, that's why the address space can be just about as large you want even if you have small amount of physical memory (actually the amount of physical memory does limit the maximum size of this virtual address space because there has to be bookkeeping about which pages are in use and which ones are not).
The idea is that pages of memory can be moved around and merged to larger continuous units in that virtual address space when memory is deallocated to avoid memory fragmentation. Tweaking the kmem* tunables in generally not recommended, starting with FreeBSD 8.2 the kernel can autotune them quite well. Last edited by kpa; May 1st, 2012 at 16:43. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Code:
Tweaking the kmem* tunables in generally not recommended, starting with FreeBSD 8.2 the kernel can autotune them quite well. Anyway, I've been testing the entire day under higher system load without any kernel panic thus far: Code:
vm.kmem_size: 7,735 GB vm.kmem_size_max: 307,2 GB vfs.zfs.arc_min: 1,0 GB vfs.zfs.arc_max: 5,0 GB Code:
vfs.numvnodes: 56385 kern.maxvnodes: 206627 Here is my output after a fresh reboot and before any read/write action on the ZFS: Code:
arc_summary.pl ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ZFS Subsystem Report Tue May 1 16:27:56 2012 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ System Memory: 0.97% 77.10 MiB Active, 0.57% 44.99 MiB Inact 2.52% 199.87 MiB Wired, 0.00% 280.00 KiB Cache 95.93% 7.42 GiB Free, 0.01% 544.00 KiB Gap Real Installed: 8.00 GiB Real Available: 99.72% 7.98 GiB Real Managed: 96.96% 7.74 GiB Logical Total: 8.00 GiB Logical Used: 6.70% 548.53 MiB Logical Free: 93.30% 7.46 GiB Kernel Memory: 98.66 MiB Data: 79.50% 78.44 MiB Text: 20.50% 20.22 MiB Kernel Memory Map: 7.74 GiB Size: 0.37% 29.06 MiB Free: 99.63% 7.71 GiB Page: 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ARC Summary: (HEALTHY) Storage pool Version: 28 Filesystem Version: 5 Memory Throttle Count: 0 ARC Misc: Deleted: 7 Recycle Misses: 0 Mutex Misses: 0 Evict Skips: 0 ARC Size: 0.03% 1.39 MiB Target Size: (Adaptive) 100.00% 5.00 GiB Min Size (Hard Limit): 20.00% 1.00 GiB Max Size (High Water): 5:1 5.00 GiB ARC Size Breakdown: Recently Used Cache Size: 50.00% 2.50 GiB Frequently Used Cache Size: 50.00% 2.50 GiB ARC Hash Breakdown: Elements Max: 166 Elements Current: 100.00% 166 Collisions: 0 Chain Max: 0 Chains: 0 Page: 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ARC Efficiency: 5.65k Cache Hit Ratio: 96.92% 5.48k Cache Miss Ratio: 3.08% 174 Actual Hit Ratio: 95.47% 5.40k Data Demand Efficiency: 100.00% 0 CACHE HITS BY CACHE LIST: Anonymously Used: 1.50% 82 Most Recently Used: 14.29% 783 Most Frequently Used: 84.22% 4.62k Most Recently Used Ghost: 0.00% 0 Most Frequently Used Ghost: 0.00% 0 CACHE HITS BY DATA TYPE: Demand Data: 0.00% 0 Prefetch Data: 0.00% 0 Demand Metadata: 98.39% 5.39k Prefetch Metadata: 1.61% 88 CACHE MISSES BY DATA TYPE: Demand Data: 0.00% 0 Prefetch Data: 0.00% 0 Demand Metadata: 51.72% 90 Prefetch Metadata: 48.28% 84 Page: 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ File-Level Prefetch: (HEALTHY) DMU Efficiency: 6.25k Hit Ratio: 99.81% 6.24k Miss Ratio: 0.19% 12 Colinear: 12 Hit Ratio: 0.00% 0 Miss Ratio: 100.00% 12 Stride: 6.16k Hit Ratio: 100.00% 6.16k Miss Ratio: 0.00% 0 DMU Misc: Reclaim: 12 Successes: 0.00% 0 Failures: 100.00% 12 Streams: 82 +Resets: 0.00% 0 -Resets: 100.00% 82 Bogus: 0 Page: 5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ZFS Tunable (sysctl): kern.maxusers 384 vm.kmem_size 8305745920 vm.kmem_size_scale 1 vm.kmem_size_min 0 vm.kmem_size_max 329853485875 vfs.zfs.l2c_only_size 0 vfs.zfs.mfu_ghost_data_lsize 0 vfs.zfs.mfu_ghost_metadata_lsize 0 vfs.zfs.mfu_ghost_size 0 vfs.zfs.mfu_data_lsize 0 vfs.zfs.mfu_metadata_lsize 168960 vfs.zfs.mfu_size 175104 vfs.zfs.mru_ghost_data_lsize 0 vfs.zfs.mru_ghost_metadata_lsize 4096 vfs.zfs.mru_ghost_size 4096 vfs.zfs.mru_data_lsize 0 vfs.zfs.mru_metadata_lsize 535040 vfs.zfs.mru_size 1063424 vfs.zfs.anon_data_lsize 0 vfs.zfs.anon_metadata_lsize 0 vfs.zfs.anon_size 0 vfs.zfs.l2arc_norw 1 vfs.zfs.l2arc_feed_again 1 vfs.zfs.l2arc_noprefetch 1 vfs.zfs.l2arc_feed_min_ms 200 vfs.zfs.l2arc_feed_secs 1 vfs.zfs.l2arc_headroom 2 vfs.zfs.l2arc_write_boost 8388608 vfs.zfs.l2arc_write_max 8388608 vfs.zfs.arc_meta_limit 1342177280 vfs.zfs.arc_meta_used 1452568 vfs.zfs.arc_min 1073741824 vfs.zfs.arc_max 5368709120 vfs.zfs.dedup.prefetch 1 vfs.zfs.mdcomp_disable 0 vfs.zfs.write_limit_override 0 vfs.zfs.write_limit_inflated 25698410496 vfs.zfs.write_limit_max 1070767104 vfs.zfs.write_limit_min 33554432 vfs.zfs.write_limit_shift 3 vfs.zfs.no_write_throttle 0 vfs.zfs.zfetch.array_rd_sz 1048576 vfs.zfs.zfetch.block_cap 256 vfs.zfs.zfetch.min_sec_reap 2 vfs.zfs.zfetch.max_streams 8 vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable 0 vfs.zfs.mg_alloc_failures 8 vfs.zfs.check_hostid 1 vfs.zfs.recover 0 vfs.zfs.txg.synctime_ms 1000 vfs.zfs.txg.timeout 5 vfs.zfs.scrub_limit 10 vfs.zfs.vdev.cache.bshift 16 vfs.zfs.vdev.cache.size 0 vfs.zfs.vdev.cache.max 16384 vfs.zfs.vdev.write_gap_limit 4096 vfs.zfs.vdev.read_gap_limit 32768 vfs.zfs.vdev.aggregation_limit 131072 vfs.zfs.vdev.ramp_rate 2 vfs.zfs.vdev.time_shift 6 vfs.zfs.vdev.min_pending 4 vfs.zfs.vdev.max_pending 10 vfs.zfs.vdev.bio_flush_disable 0 vfs.zfs.cache_flush_disable 0 vfs.zfs.zil_replay_disable 0 vfs.zfs.zio.use_uma 0 vfs.zfs.version.zpl 5 vfs.zfs.version.spa 28 vfs.zfs.version.acl 1 vfs.zfs.debug 0 vfs.zfs.super_owner 0 Page: 7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Last edited by DutchDaemon; May 2nd, 2012 at 00:27. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
... Output of arc_summary.pl right after I started cp to copy the content of a 2TB HDD over to my new ZFS:
Code:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ZFS Subsystem Report Tue May 1 18:08:44 2012
------------------------------------------------------------------------
System Memory:
1.67% 132.02 MiB Active, 38.03% 2.94 GiB Inact
36.19% 2.80 GiB Wired, 0.00% 296.00 KiB Cache
24.10% 1.86 GiB Free, 0.01% 644.00 KiB Gap
Real Installed: 8.00 GiB
Real Available: 99.72% 7.98 GiB
Real Managed: 96.96% 7.74 GiB
Logical Total: 8.00 GiB
Logical Used: 39.92% 3.19 GiB
Logical Free: 60.08% 4.81 GiB
Kernel Memory: 1.86 GiB
Data: 98.94% 1.84 GiB
Text: 1.06% 20.22 MiB
Kernel Memory Map: 7.73 GiB
Size: 23.01% 1.78 GiB
Free: 76.99% 5.95 GiB
Page: 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARC Summary: (HEALTHY)
Storage pool Version: 28
Filesystem Version: 5
Memory Throttle Count: 0
ARC Misc:
Deleted: 7
Recycle Misses: 0
Mutex Misses: 0
Evict Skips: 0
ARC Size: 35.18% 1.76 GiB
Target Size: (Adaptive) 100.00% 5.00 GiB
Min Size (Hard Limit): 20.00% 1.00 GiB
Max Size (High Water): 5:1 5.00 GiB
ARC Size Breakdown:
Recently Used Cache Size: 50.00% 2.50 GiB
Frequently Used Cache Size: 50.00% 2.50 GiB
ARC Hash Breakdown:
Elements Max: 18.11k
Elements Current: 100.00% 18.11k
Collisions: 3.89k
Chain Max: 3
Chains: 1.14k
Page: 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARC Efficiency: 998.22k
Cache Hit Ratio: 86.90% 867.43k
Cache Miss Ratio: 13.10% 130.79k
Actual Hit Ratio: 62.03% 619.25k
Data Demand Efficiency: 99.97% 6.71k
CACHE HITS BY CACHE LIST:
Anonymously Used: 28.61% 248.19k
Most Recently Used: 54.80% 475.31k
Most Frequently Used: 16.59% 143.93k
Most Recently Used Ghost: 0.00% 0
Most Frequently Used Ghost: 0.00% 0
CACHE HITS BY DATA TYPE:
Demand Data: 0.77% 6.70k
Prefetch Data: 0.00% 0
Demand Metadata: 70.61% 612.53k
Prefetch Metadata: 28.61% 248.20k
CACHE MISSES BY DATA TYPE:
Demand Data: 0.00% 2
Prefetch Data: 0.00% 0
Demand Metadata: 95.87% 125.39k
Prefetch Metadata: 4.12% 5.39k
Page: 3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
File-Level Prefetch: (HEALTHY)
DMU Efficiency: 3.62m
Hit Ratio: 81.64% 2.95m
Miss Ratio: 18.36% 664.16k
Colinear: 664.16k
Hit Ratio: 0.03% 195
Miss Ratio: 99.97% 663.97k
Stride: 2.93m
Hit Ratio: 100.00% 2.93m
Miss Ratio: 0.00% 0
DMU Misc:
Reclaim: 663.97k
Successes: 0.15% 1.00k
Failures: 99.85% 662.97k
Streams: 22.89k
+Resets: 0.00% 0
-Resets: 100.00% 22.89k
Bogus: 0
Page: 5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ZFS Tunable (sysctl):
kern.maxusers 384
vm.kmem_size 8305745920
vm.kmem_size_scale 1
vm.kmem_size_min 0
vm.kmem_size_max 329853485875
vfs.zfs.l2c_only_size 0
vfs.zfs.mfu_ghost_data_lsize 0
vfs.zfs.mfu_ghost_metadata_lsize 0
vfs.zfs.mfu_ghost_size 0
vfs.zfs.mfu_data_lsize 59343360
vfs.zfs.mfu_metadata_lsize 173056
vfs.zfs.mfu_size 59522560
vfs.zfs.mru_ghost_data_lsize 0
vfs.zfs.mru_ghost_metadata_lsize 2449408
vfs.zfs.mru_ghost_size 2449408
vfs.zfs.mru_data_lsize 1709782528
vfs.zfs.mru_metadata_lsize 8559616
vfs.zfs.mru_size 1722849792
vfs.zfs.anon_data_lsize 0
vfs.zfs.anon_metadata_lsize 0
vfs.zfs.anon_size 95635456
vfs.zfs.l2arc_norw 1
vfs.zfs.l2arc_feed_again 1
vfs.zfs.l2arc_noprefetch 1
vfs.zfs.l2arc_feed_min_ms 200
vfs.zfs.l2arc_feed_secs 1
vfs.zfs.l2arc_headroom 2
vfs.zfs.l2arc_write_boost 8388608
vfs.zfs.l2arc_write_max 8388608
vfs.zfs.arc_meta_limit 1342177280
vfs.zfs.arc_meta_used 27272600
vfs.zfs.arc_min 1073741824
vfs.zfs.arc_max 5368709120
vfs.zfs.dedup.prefetch 1
vfs.zfs.mdcomp_disable 0
vfs.zfs.write_limit_override 0
vfs.zfs.write_limit_inflated 25698410496
vfs.zfs.write_limit_max 1070767104
vfs.zfs.write_limit_min 33554432
vfs.zfs.write_limit_shift 3
vfs.zfs.no_write_throttle 0
vfs.zfs.zfetch.array_rd_sz 1048576
vfs.zfs.zfetch.block_cap 256
vfs.zfs.zfetch.min_sec_reap 2
vfs.zfs.zfetch.max_streams 8
vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable 0
vfs.zfs.mg_alloc_failures 8
vfs.zfs.check_hostid 1
vfs.zfs.recover 0
vfs.zfs.txg.synctime_ms 1000
vfs.zfs.txg.timeout 5
vfs.zfs.scrub_limit 10
vfs.zfs.vdev.cache.bshift 16
vfs.zfs.vdev.cache.size 0
vfs.zfs.vdev.cache.max 16384
vfs.zfs.vdev.write_gap_limit 4096
vfs.zfs.vdev.read_gap_limit 32768
vfs.zfs.vdev.aggregation_limit 131072
vfs.zfs.vdev.ramp_rate 2
vfs.zfs.vdev.time_shift 6
vfs.zfs.vdev.min_pending 4
vfs.zfs.vdev.max_pending 10
vfs.zfs.vdev.bio_flush_disable 0
vfs.zfs.cache_flush_disable 0
vfs.zfs.zil_replay_disable 0
vfs.zfs.zio.use_uma 0
vfs.zfs.version.zpl 5
vfs.zfs.version.spa 28
vfs.zfs.version.acl 1
vfs.zfs.debug 0
vfs.zfs.super_owner 0
Page: 7
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last edited by Leander; May 1st, 2012 at 20:38. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
And eventually my output of arc_summary.pl couple of hours later - still the same action - writing random files without - interruption of the copy process:
Code:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ZFS Subsystem Report Tue May 1 21:05:33 2012
------------------------------------------------------------------------
System Memory:
3.57% 282.61 MiB Active, 64.30% 4.97 GiB Inact
27.30% 2.11 GiB Wired, 4.67% 370.14 MiB Cache
0.15% 11.93 MiB Free, 0.01% 628.00 KiB Gap
Real Installed: 8.00 GiB
Real Available: 99.72% 7.98 GiB
Real Managed: 96.96% 7.74 GiB
Logical Total: 8.00 GiB
Logical Used: 33.17% 2.65 GiB
Logical Free: 66.83% 5.35 GiB
Kernel Memory: 1.08 GiB
Data: 98.17% 1.06 GiB
Text: 1.83% 20.32 MiB
Kernel Memory Map: 7.19 GiB
Size: 13.76% 1013.16 MiB
Free: 86.24% 6.20 GiB
Page: 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARC Summary: (THROTTLED)
Storage pool Version: 28
Filesystem Version: 5
Memory Throttle Count: 3.96k
ARC Misc:
Deleted: 1.68m
Recycle Misses: 72.33k
Mutex Misses: 7
Evict Skips: 7
ARC Size: 20.00% 1.00 GiB
Target Size: (Adaptive) 20.00% 1.00 GiB
Min Size (Hard Limit): 20.00% 1.00 GiB
Max Size (High Water): 5:1 5.00 GiB
ARC Size Breakdown:
Recently Used Cache Size: 93.75% 960.06 MiB
Frequently Used Cache Size: 6.25% 63.97 MiB
ARC Hash Breakdown:
Elements Max: 32.70k
Elements Current: 71.77% 23.46k
Collisions: 302.87k
Chain Max: 5
Chains: 2.26k
Page: 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARC Efficiency: 2.41m
Cache Hit Ratio: 93.64% 2.25m
Cache Miss Ratio: 6.36% 152.99k
Actual Hit Ratio: 81.53% 1.96m
Data Demand Efficiency: 99.98% 1.19m
Data Prefetch Efficiency: 61.05% 42.68k
CACHE HITS BY CACHE LIST:
Anonymously Used: 12.70% 286.05k
Most Recently Used: 30.11% 678.21k
Most Frequently Used: 56.96% 1.28m
Most Recently Used Ghost: 0.09% 2.02k
Most Frequently Used Ghost: 0.14% 3.13k
CACHE HITS BY DATA TYPE:
Demand Data: 52.67% 1.19m
Prefetch Data: 1.16% 26.06k
Demand Metadata: 34.10% 768.23k
Prefetch Metadata: 12.07% 271.92k
CACHE MISSES BY DATA TYPE:
Demand Data: 0.12% 184
Prefetch Data: 10.87% 16.62k
Demand Metadata: 83.51% 127.77k
Prefetch Metadata: 5.50% 8.42k
Page: 3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
File-Level Prefetch: (HEALTHY)
DMU Efficiency: 55.20m
Hit Ratio: 98.80% 54.53m
Miss Ratio: 1.20% 664.34k
Colinear: 664.34k
Hit Ratio: 0.03% 196
Miss Ratio: 99.97% 664.14k
Stride: 54.49m
Hit Ratio: 100.00% 54.49m
Miss Ratio: 0.00% 114
DMU Misc:
Reclaim: 664.14k
Successes: 0.17% 1.12k
Failures: 99.83% 663.03k
Streams: 41.08k
+Resets: 0.10% 43
-Resets: 99.90% 41.04k
Bogus: 0
Page: 5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ZFS Tunable (sysctl):
kern.maxusers 384
vm.kmem_size 8305745920
vm.kmem_size_scale 1
vm.kmem_size_min 0
vm.kmem_size_max 329853485875
vfs.zfs.l2c_only_size 0
vfs.zfs.mfu_ghost_data_lsize 981729280
vfs.zfs.mfu_ghost_metadata_lsize 23986688
vfs.zfs.mfu_ghost_size 1005715968
vfs.zfs.mfu_data_lsize 0
vfs.zfs.mfu_metadata_lsize 9241600
vfs.zfs.mfu_size 11002880
vfs.zfs.mru_ghost_data_lsize 0
vfs.zfs.mru_ghost_metadata_lsize 67137536
vfs.zfs.mru_ghost_size 67137536
vfs.zfs.mru_data_lsize 932244480
vfs.zfs.mru_metadata_lsize 9625600
vfs.zfs.mru_size 965317632
vfs.zfs.anon_data_lsize 0
vfs.zfs.anon_metadata_lsize 0
vfs.zfs.anon_size 41498112
vfs.zfs.l2arc_norw 1
vfs.zfs.l2arc_feed_again 1
vfs.zfs.l2arc_noprefetch 1
vfs.zfs.l2arc_feed_min_ms 200
vfs.zfs.l2arc_feed_secs 1
vfs.zfs.l2arc_headroom 2
vfs.zfs.l2arc_write_boost 8388608
vfs.zfs.l2arc_write_max 8388608
vfs.zfs.arc_meta_limit 1342177280
vfs.zfs.arc_meta_used 100359352
vfs.zfs.arc_min 1073741824
vfs.zfs.arc_max 5368709120
vfs.zfs.dedup.prefetch 1
vfs.zfs.mdcomp_disable 0
vfs.zfs.write_limit_override 0
vfs.zfs.write_limit_inflated 25698410496
vfs.zfs.write_limit_max 1070767104
vfs.zfs.write_limit_min 33554432
vfs.zfs.write_limit_shift 3
vfs.zfs.no_write_throttle 0
vfs.zfs.zfetch.array_rd_sz 1048576
vfs.zfs.zfetch.block_cap 256
vfs.zfs.zfetch.min_sec_reap 2
vfs.zfs.zfetch.max_streams 8
vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable 0
vfs.zfs.mg_alloc_failures 8
vfs.zfs.check_hostid 1
vfs.zfs.recover 0
vfs.zfs.txg.synctime_ms 1000
vfs.zfs.txg.timeout 5
vfs.zfs.scrub_limit 10
vfs.zfs.vdev.cache.bshift 16
vfs.zfs.vdev.cache.size 0
vfs.zfs.vdev.cache.max 16384
vfs.zfs.vdev.write_gap_limit 4096
vfs.zfs.vdev.read_gap_limit 32768
vfs.zfs.vdev.aggregation_limit 131072
vfs.zfs.vdev.ramp_rate 2
vfs.zfs.vdev.time_shift 6
vfs.zfs.vdev.min_pending 4
vfs.zfs.vdev.max_pending 10
vfs.zfs.vdev.bio_flush_disable 0
vfs.zfs.cache_flush_disable 0
vfs.zfs.zil_replay_disable 0
vfs.zfs.zio.use_uma 0
vfs.zfs.version.zpl 5
vfs.zfs.version.spa 28
vfs.zfs.version.acl 1
vfs.zfs.debug 0
vfs.zfs.super_owner 0
Page: 7
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note that Code:
Kernel Memory: 1.08 GiB
Data: 98.17% 1.06 GiB
Text: 1.83% 20.32 MiB
Code:
Kernel Memory: 1.86 GiB
Data: 98.94% 1.84 GiB
Text: 1.06% 20.22 MiB
Last edited by DutchDaemon; May 2nd, 2012 at 00:28. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Btw. I have only one RAIDz1 running (currently resilvering for testing purposes):
... The md[n] devices are only for temporary testing. But sill, each of them has its own source file on a seperate HDD. Code:
zpool status -v
pool: zStar
state: DEGRADED
status: One or more devices is currently being resilvered. The pool will
continue to function, possibly in a degraded state.
action: Wait for the resilver to complete.
scan: resilver in progress since Tue May 1 20:54:40 2012
68,0G scanned out of 214G at 33,5M/s, 1h14m to go
7,56G resilvered, 31,75% done
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
zStar DEGRADED 0 0 0
raidz1-0 DEGRADED 0 0 0
md3 ONLINE 0 0 0
md4 ONLINE 0 0 0
md5 ONLINE 0 0 0
md6 ONLINE 0 0 0
md7 ONLINE 0 0 0
md8 ONLINE 0 0 0
replacing-5 UNAVAIL 0 0 0
6048967463963296996 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 was /dev/md8/old
md8 ONLINE 0 0 0 (resilvering)
md9 ONLINE 0 0 0
ada3p1 ONLINE 0 0 0
ada8p1 ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: No known data errors
Thanks for hints Last edited by DutchDaemon; May 2nd, 2012 at 00:29. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Start with a very conservative setting of vfs.zfs.arc_max, let's say 1GB and up it in 1GB increments. Leave other settings to their defaults. This way you can very quickly tell if the crash is really from memory exhaustion caused by the ARC cache or something else.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Code:
vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1 vfs.zfs.arc_max="4096M" Also please post the output of: # zfs get all zStar # zdb -DD zStarRegards
__________________
Powered by BareBSD |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not going to get involved in zfs tuning discussion as I have no expertise in it yet but just noting that there is a port of arc_summary.pl under sysutils/zfs-stats.
Last edited by phoenix; May 1st, 2012 at 22:38. Reason: Please format your post! |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
How do you set up your system? Where doea\s root reside and where do you put the swap file?
Last edited by DutchDaemon; May 2nd, 2012 at 16:21. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Powered by BareBSD |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
pkg_add -r zfs-stats
Last edited by DutchDaemon; May 3rd, 2012 at 12:25. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Please note that what I wrote above about the kmem tunables only applies to amd64, i386 is quite different because of limited address space and usually requires tuning of kmem settings for stable operation of ZFS.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| KDE 4.3 is great. But it uses too much memory. | everypot | KDE | 10 | July 25th, 2012 08:43 |
| [Solved] posix memory based semaphore in shared memory | renzor | FreeBSD Development | 2 | January 24th, 2011 05:41 |
| [Solved] managing memory in freebsd - inactive memory | chrcol | General | 5 | March 12th, 2010 01:33 |
| [Solved] Inactive Memory vs. Free Memory | dordal | General | 5 | November 23rd, 2009 13:39 |
| Memory check | ccc | System Hardware | 9 | July 14th, 2009 18:47 |