17ce6
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Feedback Share your ideas, questions or suggestions with us here. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hello,
I would like to see a Virtualization forum section. Virtualbox for FreeBSD masses is getting closer. I think this might be useful for those interested in setting up virtual servers like ESXi or XenServer and discussing all types virtualization, including as it relates to FreeBSD. What do you think? knotabot |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
general rule here is,if there is a need about subforum section then and only then will be created. 5-10 qeustions/month dont deserve subsection, despite that will (may)be more organized (imo).
with virtualbox in ports, xen under way this need is near but not here. patience
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I've got 5-10 ??? a day for at least a month.
And with every answer leading to more questions, it's a snowball. In the application of patience you become aware of yourself. -Edgar Cayce Thanks mk. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
You forgot to mention important visualization: jails
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just a quick note of support for the idea of a virtualization section. Currently, I ask elsewhere simply because there isn't such.
fyi, -Craig
__________________
Hic Obdurate Cognati |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
There's not enough traffic yet to warrant a completely separate sub-forum just for virtualisation topics.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bumpity bump. Is there enough traffic now for a separate subforum?
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think that the problem is not the traffic but the fact that FreeBSD does not support any type of virtualization.
PS I don't consider jails nor bhyve a virtualization technique.
__________________
Powered by BareBSD |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Even the freebsd-virtualization mailing list doesn't have much traffic.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
There's VirtualBox and qemu. A virtualization forum would also apply to running FreeBSD as a guest rather than a host.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I would suggest that setting up a virtualization forum on here for those products will simply encourage FreeBSD issues with such products to be diverted away from the official support resources (possibly over the long term resulting in poorer support for FreeBSD in those products). Just because something exists in the FreeBSD world, it doesn't mean that it is in our best interests to host a support forum for it. Especially when official support resources already exist.
__________________
I use: FreeBSD, Mac OS X, Windows, Netapp, Cisco UCS, Cisco CUCM, Cisco IOS, Cisco ASA, vSphere 5.1, Cisco ISE, Orion NPM |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I don't know if a separate forum topic is needed yet, but understand the desire for it. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'd like a virtualisation section as well!
BUUUUMP! Last edited by FreeDomBSD; April 19th, 2013 at 15:57. Reason: haha |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Can't you just visualise that in your head, then?
__________________
Ken sent me. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Besides the matter of sufficient traffic, there may be some concern about overlap with existing forums such as General, Installing & Upgrading and Networking, to name but a few.
However, it appears to me that both Embedded and Other Architectures are relatively low on traffic. Perhaps we could merge those two and pull in virtualisation as well. I'm not saying we should, nor am I speaking as a moderator in this post, I'm just thinking aloud for a moment.
__________________
Ken sent me. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| VIrtualization on AMD64 | z662 | Installation and Maintenance of FreeBSD Ports or Packages | 2 | March 18th, 2009 10:19 |
| Current status of virtualization | fonz | General | 7 | February 9th, 2009 03:23 |
| Storage section | LaR3 | Feedback | 4 | November 21st, 2008 08:19 |