Search results

Hello! We're currently using ng_ipfw + ng_car for traffic shaping. This has been working good until we got some more heavy traffic load, and now it crashes our system (FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2) constantly. Now we are thinking about moving back to dummynet. Stupid question: when testing speed...

Or better use pw: pw group mod group_name -m user_name

Yeah, i thought about that, but is there a "correct" way to do this? I mean, create some vlan iface without vlan tag or what ever...?

I'm using cacti to monitor interface usage. I have one physical interface bge1 and one vlan dev assigned to this interface. The problem is that counters on bge1 shows both tagged and untagged packets. Is there a way to get untagged packets statistics on physical interface (bge1)?

Ok, thanks. The only solution for me is to dynamically add rules to ipfw... :(

That would not be a Linux, it's GNU/kFreeBSD.

Hi there. I want to use ipfw + ng_car for traffic shaping. I store ng_ipfw hook number in ipfw table as value, then I use this value as tablearg in the rules. The problem is that I want to use 2 tables (one for user's IP addresses + ng_ipfw hook number, second one for specific addresses on...

I guess that disabling services is not a good solution. We need parallelization of kernel device detection and boot procedures. And maybe some services can start in parallel.

I think your answer is pf pptp proxy: frickin

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw/2009-June/003916.html What's your opinion about this? Who's next? pf for Linux? iptables for FreeBSD?

ALTQ can only work with outgoing traffic, so "pass in" won't work with ALTQ. I think you can specify pass out on ext_if to limit upload, and pass out on int_if to limit download.

For X11 screenshots, you can use scrot

How can I run it in 32bit mode?