A combination of both better than one of them :)
ALTQ doesn't have bw limit per IP, so i must use dummynet for my network.
IPFW is good firewall but natd is not good solution for NAT process.
And about 4 or 5 years, it has worked very well.
(PFSense use same combination but include some hacking)
Hello,
I used PF and dummynet together about two years and worked fine.
Recently i have upgraded the system 7.2 to 8.2 and dummynet doesn't work anymore.
If any packet belong the client IP puts any pipe, it drops and pflog says it blocked by last pf rule. But it match previous rule.
If i...
# cd /tmp
# fetch http://security.FreeBSD.org/patches/SA-09:12/bind.patch
# fetch http://security.FreeBSD.org/patches/SA-09:12/bind.patch.asc
# cd /usr/src
# patch < /tmp/bind.patch
# cd /usr/src/lib/bind
# make obj && make depend && make && make install
There is no errors during patching.
I tried the bind patch (http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-09:12.bind.asc) but it gives errors.
/usr/src/lib/bind/dns/../../../contrib/bind9/lib/dns/dispatch.c:301: error: expected ')' before '*' token
/usr/src/lib/bind/dns/../../../contrib/bind9/lib/dns/dispatch.c:311: error...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.