Search results

Hi there, I am sorry for posting a question regarding pfSense, but it being based on Freebsd FreeBSD and not having received any reply back from the pfSense forum, I thought I might be a good idea to post the same question here. I have been struggling trying to understand why ICMP traffic is...

Did you get any chance with the realtek chipset then?

Hi all, I have a created an init script for rtorrent, to run as a deamon. Problem is the pid files is not created. Don't think it's a permission problem, because running the rtorrent daemon as root instead of "gettons" user it won't be created anyway. This is the rc script file. #!/bin/sh # #...

Fixed installing this version, which is not the devel one (regardless what the package is called), but the stable. libtorrent-devel-0.12.6_1 BitTorrent Library written in C++ (development version) rtorrent-devel-0.8.6_1 BitTorrent Client written in C++ (development version)

Just found that, even if I compiled with xmlrpc support, when I start rtorrent, I cannot see the xmlrpc message on the screen, which usually pops out, like this: XMLRPC initialized with 517 functions. I got a black screen without the usual rtorrent interface...and the cpu goes up to 100% in...

Also, I am running the 64bit version of FreeBSD 8.2.

Here is the config file $ grep -v '^#' .rtorrent.rc max_peers = 60 max_peers_seed = 13 max_uploads = 3 download_rate = 700 upload_rate = 10 directory = /stuff/media/rtorrent_temp/ session = /usr/home/gettons/.rtorrentsession/ port_range = 55000-55000 port_random = no check_hash = yes...

Hi all, I've installed through ports rtorrent (with xmlrpc option). All went fine, apart that when I run rtorrent, it uses 100%. No matter what it is doing (downloading, doing nothing with downloads in the queue or doing nothing with any file in queue). It just takes 100% of cpu all the time...

Hi all, I wonder what should I run to recompile a specific port with different options. When you get prompted for the options you can miss something and want to integrate later? How is this possible?

This makes sense. Unfortunately if you run zfs set... only the last one would be valid.

Didn't work either :-(

Hi all, I am playing with zfs sharenfs and I came across a problem. Unless I put a single host/network, I don't get any export after showmount -e I presume because the syntax is not quite right... What I need to do is to export: /media 192.168.3.0/24 192.168.4.3 192.168.4.21 So not just a...

Would this NIC be fully recognized (1000 Mb)? http://www.intel.com/products/desktop/adapters/gigabit-ct/gigabit-ct-overview.htm In the list of hardware http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.2R/hardware.html#ETHERNET (which as far as I know is the first place to have a look at before buying) the...

Sounds like I have lots of choices then :-) Because the NAS machine will run quite static ( and lightweight ) software on it not even running/accessible 24h a day like: squeezeboxserver ( music on the mirror/raidz disks btw ), samba, nfs, cups, lighttpd, rtorrent ( media on the mirror/raidz...

That makes sense. Yep, I will use backups so I could recover the filesystem faster. Keeping on a different hard disk is quite useful actually, so if something breaks I can still put hd somewhere else and access the data.

Option 1: looks interesting. Questions: 1) if the OS disk breaks, would that be painful or not to reinstall the system on a new drive and make it recognize the current zpool mirror (the other 2 1tb disks)? 2) what is the advantage (in this particular scenario of course) of keeping the OS on a...

Why not keeping the OS (250GB one) on UFS in this case? Because I have a zfs mirror on those 2 1tb disks what is the point of having the OS on ZFS ? Sorry forgot to mention that in this case (2x mirrors) I would buy 2 extra 1 tb disk, this way I ll have 4 1tb disks. I won't be using the 250GB...

great howto. I think I ll try it out. One question. Why did you use gmirror instead of zfs for the OS ? is that not possible ?

Hi, I have been using linux for the last 5 years trying to set up my nas machine (HP Proliant microserver) with FreeBSD, mostly for two reasons: zfs and the wonderful packaging system. Thing is, I don't really know where to start. :-) At the moment, my nas machine is a Via Artigo A2000 with...