Search results

Hi, I have been trying to build an arm image for my RaspberryPi B reading http://www.robolace.com/articles/installing-freebsd-on-raspberry-pi. However, running ./crochet.sh -c config.sh, I get a "Can't find appropriate FreeBSD xdev tools" while I have built it. Thank you.

Hi, I am currently trying to have IPv6 connectivity on my FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE box. To do this, I followed http://borderworlds.dk/blog/20120122-00.html as I want an autoconfiguration. But all I get is a local link IPv6 (fe80*). I thought IPv6 support was not enabled in my kernel but I get an...

So, is there anything I can do? And does what you said explain the outgoing connection getting blocked too?

Thanks for having answered. My server is running a tor relay so max-src-conn is just for having a list of the tor nodes I'm connected to, none rule uses it. Then, the second line you gave is probably a connection to one of these tor nodes.

Hi, I have some issues with pf on FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE. Some incoming and outgoing connections are blocked, while they weren't before. Here is pf.conf: #Macro ext_if = "fxp0" int_if = "lo1" # Tables table <flood> persist table <b> persist table <tor> persist # Rules scrub in all nat on...

Hi, I am interested in encrypting my zpool but I have no idea of the way I could do so. Here is my GPT scheme: Antonin# gpart show => 34 488397101 ada0 GPT (232G) 34 128 1 freebsd-boot (64k) 162 2097152 2 freebsd-ufs (1.0G) 2097314...

I get an error with security/ssl-admin

I think I am gonna try that tool. Thank you. Gollum

I tried but I get an vars: setenv: not found error.

Hi, I have an issue generating openvpn keys. Here is vars file: # NOTE: If you installed from an RPM, # don't edit this file in place in # /usr/share/openvpn/easy-rsa -- # instead, you should copy the whole # easy-rsa directory to another location # (such as /etc/openvpn) so that your # edits...

Hi, I think I do exactly what you aim at doing; you can create lo1 interface and bind your internal network to it. You will need NAT then.

It works fine, I was just wondering after having seen what fbsd1 said.

So, is my NAT rule wrong ? Thank you.

Hi, I would like you to say me if there is something wrong with my pf configuration please. pf.conf #Macro ext_if = "fxp0" int_if = "lo1" # Tables table <flood> persist table <test> persist table <tor> persist # Rules scrub in all nat on $ext_if from lo1:network to any -> ($ext_if) rdr...

pfctl -sa Serveur# pfctl -sa No ALTQ support in kernel ALTQ related functions disabled TRANSLATION RULES: nat on fxp0 inet from 192.168.50.0/24 to any -> (fxp0) round-robin FILTER RULES: pass log all flags S/SA keep state STATES: all tcp 192.168.1.40:22 <- 192.168.1.29:35041...

Yeap. It doesn't fix the problem..

I had allowed ICMP paquets so that I could find what the issue was. And a telnet times out too.. I really have no idea.

It is, I can see the paquets leave via fxp0. It shows the request pass, but not the answer. Nope, my server's DNS aren't google's. It's because of NAT.

How may I fix this ?

Hi, Here is my network: Internet----- BOX (192.168.1.1/24) ----- (.40 ; fxp0) SERVER (192.168.50.1/24; lo1) There is a jail with the 192.168.50.1 ip...