PDA

View Full Version : Which FTP server software do you use?


zuul
November 27th, 2008, 08:21
Hi There,

I was just wondering.... what FTP server software do you use?

I now run Pure-FTPd with a MySQL backend and a webinterface for user administration.

I am moving to a new server, and I want to know what you run.

Thanx!

Best regards,
Martijn

hark
November 27th, 2008, 09:08
I use scp(1) for everything. Never saw much of a point in running a ftpd.

Mel_Flynn
November 27th, 2008, 09:59
Proftpd with either mysql or pgsql backend. Stock FreeBSD ftpd for low volume private things, since scp doesn't support resume.

Started on Proftpd a few years back, because it was "one of the good options" and the configuration syntax was similar to apache. Never looked back really.

gilinko
November 27th, 2008, 11:25
I started with proftpd with a mysql backend way back in the days, and then moved to pureftpd. Currently I use vsftpd as I find it easy to integrate with PAM(and ldap, AD etc.)

danger@
November 27th, 2008, 12:27
pure-ftpd, vsftpd and also stock base system ftpd

marius
November 27th, 2008, 17:06
Vsftpd

MartijnAtLico
November 27th, 2008, 18:03
Proftpd.. also because it was a good option back then. I don't know if there are better alternatives, but I don't really care either.. I encourage our clients to use sftp/scp.

empty
November 27th, 2008, 21:34
Built in ftpd server. Works like a charm for my usage.

APseudoUtopia
November 28th, 2008, 17:41
vsFTPd. I used PureFTPd a while ago on linux. But then I discovered vsFTPd, and it's been great to me.

tomh009
November 28th, 2008, 18:22
I use scp(1) for everything. Never saw much of a point in running a ftpd.

scp unfortunately doesn't really help a lot if you need to support non-expert users uploading files from a variety of desktop operating systems. FTP is still the lowest common denominator ...

I have been using the standard ftpd with groups to control access (most users get locked into their home directories).

g1vrg
November 29th, 2008, 22:36
vsftpd and for www thttpd - both excellent little servers.

dinoex@
November 30th, 2008, 09:45
I have used wu-ftpd for a long time,
despite frequent security issues,
only one of the sites i have seen where compromised.
And that had a 3 year old version installed.

I have seen a good number of sites compromised by proftpd.
At one of such incidents, the problem was discussed on the
proftp mailinglist for 3 weeks, without any anouncment on the webseite.
After 4 weeks tehre was sill no security anouncment for this root-exploit.
Therefore I migrated all sites in reach to vsftp.
Today proftpd has more vulerabilities that wu-ftpd.

I prefer vsftpd now,
very stable and good throughput!

In doubt look at the code inside.

cajunman4life
November 30th, 2008, 19:16
vsftpd, but with no outside access. Users are advised to use an FTP client that supports scp (SSH).

The reason I have it at all is for things like auto-updating wordpress (which asks for ftp credentials). Outside access to the ftp daemon is blocked at the firewall.

dima
November 30th, 2008, 20:21
I am moving to a new server, and I want to know what you run.

Why are you moving from Pure-FTPd (reasons)?

kisswen
December 2nd, 2008, 07:11
Pure-ftpd

sT4k3
December 2nd, 2008, 11:28
vsftpd

Business_Woman
December 2nd, 2008, 17:58
pure-ftpd

Darwin
December 2nd, 2008, 18:41
I use default FreeBSD FTP daemon.

mfaridi
December 2nd, 2008, 18:54
I use Pure-ftpd , but when I find good howto about vsftpd I wiill try it.

blackjack
December 2nd, 2008, 20:41
proftpd with nls compiled from sources manualy

alvis
December 3rd, 2008, 11:24
proftpd with nls compiled from sources manualy

It's right.

oversize
December 3rd, 2008, 13:21
vsftpd, through xinetd,

Setup is very limited though. Flatfile user db, no differentiation between domains, All live under /var/www ...

jadawin@
December 3rd, 2008, 13:34
I use vsftpd. Works great.

CyberCr33p
December 3rd, 2008, 14:19
pure-ftpd

dave
December 4th, 2008, 17:52
PureFTPd for the specific reason that it supports atomic file transfers, so that when uploading to a web site, the file is uploaded to a temp location and then atomically replaced into destination. This prevents a web client retrieving a partial web page. But, maybe the others can do that now, too. I use a MySQL backend and a php web interface for administrating virtual users.

stathis
December 8th, 2008, 19:25
vsFTPd, been using it for years.

I also like ProFTPd a lot, but prefer vsFTPd.

zoosky
December 11th, 2008, 09:10
vsftpd

r-c-e
December 13th, 2008, 00:20
proftpd on personal systems, and ncftpd on work systems

fraenki
December 18th, 2008, 10:59
ProFTPD - I really like the Apache-style configuration file.
Besides that the project is mature and still alive.

CeReAl_KiLLeR_Du_77
December 18th, 2008, 18:12
Proftpd + proftpd administrator (quota, sql, anonymous, etc..)

ProFTPD - I really like the Apache-style configuration file.

+1

edogawaconan
December 28th, 2008, 06:14
ProFTPD - I really like the Apache-style configuration file.
Besides that the project is mature and still alive.

change the 'like' with 'hate' for me. :)

too bad it's alive with bunch of FIXME (like this one (http://www.proftpd.org/docs/directives/linked/config_ref_context_Global.html)) in the docs :(

Voltar
December 28th, 2008, 08:12
Pure-FTPd.

On a few of my devel/toy machines I've used the default ftpd in FreeBSD/OpenBSD in the past.

sniper007
December 30th, 2008, 16:55
vsFTPd. I used PureFTPd a while ago on linux. But then I discovered vsFTPd, and it's been great to me.

+1


vsFTPd is great and probably the most secure

cloud
December 31st, 2008, 16:17
I use the original ftpd tuned with the chroot mode for little needs.
When i need something more powerfull, I use proftpd + mysql

hydra
December 31st, 2008, 17:38
I would also recommend pure-ftpd, works great.